NTSE vs QQQ
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. NTSE delivered stronger 1-year returns. NTSE offers more diversification with 439 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NTSE | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.32% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $56M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.70% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 439 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +20.86% | +19.52% | |
| 1Y Return | +39.52% | +26.68% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.98% | +26.64% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.32% | +15.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.0% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -42.8% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | WisdomTree Investments | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 20, 2021 | Mar 10, 1999 |
NTSE vs QQQ Performance
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund (NTSE) is a ETF from WisdomTree Investments and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year NTSE returned +39.52% while QQQ returned +26.68%. Year to date, NTSE is up 20.86% versus a gain of 19.52% for QQQ.
Over three years, NTSE compounded at +22.98% per year against +26.64% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +6.32% and +15.36% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.14% annualized vs +5.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 20.0% for NTSE. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -42.8% for NTSE and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.64. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NTSE charges 0.32% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $32 vs $18 annually, a gap of $14 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NTSE currently yields 2.70% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
NTSE and QQQ share 1 holdings out of 528 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in NTSE | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| PDD:IE | 0.37% | 0.27% | 0.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NTSE or QQQ?
NTSE has an expense ratio of 0.32% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $14 per year of difference.
Which performed better, NTSE or QQQ?
Over the past year NTSE returned +39.52% vs +26.68% for QQQ, so NTSE leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), NTSE annualized +5.56% vs +13.14% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, NTSE or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 20.0% for NTSE. Worst drawdown: NTSE -42.8% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both NTSE and QQQ?
NTSE and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.64, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between NTSE and QQQ?
NTSE and QQQ share 1 common holdings with a 0.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 528 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, NTSE or QQQ?
NTSE yields 2.70% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so NTSE currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.