NTSE vs VTI
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. NTSE delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NTSE | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.32% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $54M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.59% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 439 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +20.91% | +14.96% | |
| 1Y Return | +37.52% | +22.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.57% | +21.51% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.17% | +12.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.0% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -42.8% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | WisdomTree Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 18, 2021 | May 24, 2001 |
NTSE vs VTI Performance
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Efficient Core Fund (NTSE) is a ETF from WisdomTree Investments and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year NTSE returned +37.52% while VTI returned +22.39%. Year to date, NTSE is up 20.91% versus a gain of 14.96% for VTI.
Over three years, NTSE compounded at +22.57% per year against +21.51% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +6.17% and +12.36% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.16% annualized vs +5.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NTSE has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.0% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -42.8% for NTSE and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.65. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NTSE charges 0.32% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $32 vs $3 annually, a gap of $29 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NTSE currently yields 2.59% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
NTSE and VTI share 0 holdings out of 3202 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NTSE or VTI?
NTSE has an expense ratio of 0.32% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $29 per year of difference.
Which performed better, NTSE or VTI?
Over the past year NTSE returned +37.52% vs +22.39% for VTI, so NTSE leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), NTSE annualized +5.57% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, NTSE or VTI?
NTSE has been the more volatile fund at 20.0% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: NTSE -42.8% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both NTSE and VTI?
NTSE and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.65, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between NTSE and VTI?
NTSE and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 3202 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, NTSE or VTI?
NTSE yields 2.59% while VTI yields 1.07%, so NTSE currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.