NTSI vs QQQ
NTSI vs QQQ
WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. NTSI offers more diversification with 443 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NTSI | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.26% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $486M | $455.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.54% | 0.41% | |
| Holdings | 453 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +11.33% | +18.20% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.45% | +27.63% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.80% | +25.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.37% | +15.12% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.4% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -34.0% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | WisdomTree Investments | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 18, 2021 | Mar 10, 1999 |
NTSI vs QQQ Performance
WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund (NTSI) is a ETF from WisdomTree Investments and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year NTSI returned +22.45% while QQQ returned +27.63%. Year to date, NTSI is up 11.33% versus a gain of 18.20% for QQQ.
Over three years, NTSI compounded at +15.80% per year against +25.54% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +6.37% and +15.12% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.11% annualized vs +6.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 16.4% for NTSI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.0% for NTSI and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.64. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NTSI charges 0.26% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $26 vs $18 annually, a gap of $8 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NTSI currently yields 3.54% against 0.41% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
NTSI and QQQ share 2 holdings out of 544 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NTSI or QQQ?
NTSI has an expense ratio of 0.26% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $8 per year of difference.
Which performed better, NTSI or QQQ?
Over the past year NTSI returned +22.45% vs +27.63% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), NTSI annualized +6.61% vs +13.11% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, NTSI or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 16.4% for NTSI. Worst drawdown: NTSI -34.0% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both NTSI and QQQ?
NTSI and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.64, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between NTSI and QQQ?
NTSI and QQQ share 2 common holdings with a 0.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 544 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, NTSI or QQQ?
NTSI yields 3.54% while QQQ yields 0.41%, so NTSI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.