NUIF vs VOO

NUIF vs VOO

Which is better, NUIF or VOO?

Mid Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 53.7%.

Lower Fees: VOOLess Concentrated: VOO

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricNUIFVOO
Expense Ratio0.55%0.03%Best
AUM$24M$997.4B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.04%
Holdings37509
YTD Return-6.15%+13.82%Best
1Y Return-+18.56%
3Y Return (annualized)-+23.49%
5Y Return (annualized)-+13.34%
Top 10 Weight53.7%37.6%Best
Fund FamilyNuveenVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleMid Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionJun 17, 2026Sep 7, 2010

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

NUIF vs VOO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

NUIF vs VOO Performance

Nuveen US Infrastructure ETF (NUIF) is an ETF from Nuveen and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, NUIF is down 6.15% versus a gain of 13.82% for VOO.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

NUIF charges 0.55% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $3 annually, a gap of $52 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NUIF currently yields 0.00% against 1.04% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

NUIF already in VOO72.0%
VOO already in NUIF2.5%

72.0% of NUIF's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 2.5% of VOO's money is in holdings NUIF also owns.

Most of NUIF is already inside VOO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

24 positions in common, counted across the 40 positions we hold weights for in NUIF and 494 in VOO, against full books of 37 and 509.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 463 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for NUIF (96.7% of the fund), and 7 for NUIF that do not appear in VOO (11.7%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in NUIFWeight in VOODifference
ETREntergy Corp.7.45%0.08%7.37%
NEENextera Energy Inc6.93%0.28%6.65%
AEPAmerican Electric Power Co Inc7.09%0.11%6.98%
XELXcel Energy Inc.6.11%0.08%6.03%
LNTAlliant Energy Corp.4.88%0.03%4.85%
TRGPTarga Resources Corp Preferred4.35%0.09%4.26%
WMBWilliams Cos. Inc.3.97%0.14%3.83%
WMWaste Mgmt3.64%0.13%3.51%
AEEAmeren Corporation Utilities3.70%0.05%3.65%
OKEOneok Inc.2.65%0.09%2.56%

72.0% of NUIF is already inside VOO.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

NUIFVOO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, NUIF or VOO?

NUIF has an expense ratio of 0.55% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $52 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between NUIF and VOO?

72.0% of NUIF's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 2.5% of VOO's is in holdings NUIF also owns. They hold 24 positions in common, counted across the 40 positions we hold weights for in NUIF and 494 in VOO.

Which pays a higher dividend, NUIF or VOO?

NUIF yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VOO better than NUIF?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 53.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.