OAKM vs VTI
Oakmark US Large Cap ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | OAKM | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1.2B | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.63% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 41 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +9.67% | +12.65% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.45% | +21.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.11% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.6% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -15.2% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Oakmark Funds | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 3, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
OAKM vs VTI Performance
Oakmark US Large Cap ETF (OAKM) is a ETF from Oakmark Funds and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year OAKM returned +20.45% while VTI returned +21.39%. Year to date, OAKM is up 9.67% versus a gain of 12.65% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 10.6% for OAKM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.2% for OAKM and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.46. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
OAKM charges 0.59% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $3 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, OAKM currently yields 0.63% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
OAKM and VTI share 35 holdings out of 2791 unique holdings combined, representing a 7.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, OAKM or VTI?
OAKM has an expense ratio of 0.59% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $56 per year of difference.
Which performed better, OAKM or VTI?
Over the past year OAKM returned +20.45% vs +21.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), OAKM annualized +15.05% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, OAKM or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 10.6% for OAKM. Worst drawdown: OAKM -15.2% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both OAKM and VTI?
OAKM and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.46, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between OAKM and VTI?
OAKM and VTI share 35 common holdings with a 7.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2791 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, OAKM or VTI?
OAKM yields 0.63% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.