OEF vs VYM
iShares S&P 100 ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, OEF or VYM?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. OEF led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, VYM over 1Y. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 52.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | OEF | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.20% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $20.3B | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.85% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 106 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +10.25% | +11.71%Best |
| 1Y Return | +14.79% | +16.24%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.80%Best | +17.24% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.10%Best | +11.86% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.3% | 14.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -55.5%Best | -58.8% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $19,339Best | $17,514 |
| Top 10 Weight | 52.1% | 26.1%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Oct 23, 2000 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 16, 2006 to Sep 16, 2026 (19.8 years).
OEF vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 19.8 years both funds cover.
OEF vs VYM Performance
iShares S&P 100 ETF (OEF) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year OEF returned +14.79% while VYM returned +16.24%. Year to date, OEF is up 10.25% versus a gain of 11.71% for VYM.
Over three years, OEF compounded at +22.80% per year against +17.24% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +14.10% and +11.86% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, OEF has the edge at +9.57% annualized vs +6.84%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
OEF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -55.5% for OEF and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.89. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
OEF charges 0.20% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $20 vs $4 annually, a gap of $16 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, OEF currently yields 0.85% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
30.9% of OEF's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 59.3% of VYM's money is in holdings OEF also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
60 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in OEF and 557 in VYM, against full books of 106 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 102 and 557 positions we hold weights for.
VYM holds 468 positions OEF does not, 37.7% of the fund.
Largest: ADI 0.73%, ETN 0.65%, CB 0.50%, PGR 0.50%, DELL 0.50%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in OEF | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.65% | 7.35% | 3.70% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 1.99% | 3.82% | 1.83% |
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 1.39% | 2.63% | 1.24% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 1.33% | 2.51% | 1.18% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 0.91% | 1.86% | 0.95% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 0.94% | 1.80% | 0.86% |
| BACBank of America Corp.: Financials | 0.84% | 1.66% | 0.82% |
| CVXChevron Corp | 0.80% | 1.48% | 0.68% |
| CATCaterpillar, Inc. | 0.76% | 1.50% | 0.74% |
| UNHUnitedhealth Group Incorporated | 0.74% | 1.52% | 0.78% |
59.3% of VYM is already inside OEF.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, OEF or VYM?
OEF has an expense ratio of 0.20% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $16 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, OEF or VYM?
Over the past year OEF returned +14.79% vs +16.24% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), OEF annualized +9.57% vs +6.84% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, OEF or VYM?
OEF has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: OEF -55.5% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both OEF and VYM?
OEF and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.89, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between OEF and VYM?
59.3% of VYM's money is in holdings OEF also owns. 59.3% of VYM's is in holdings OEF also owns. They hold 60 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in OEF and 557 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, OEF or VYM?
OEF yields 0.85% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than OEF?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. OEF led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, VYM over 1Y. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 52.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.