ONLN vs VOO
ProShares Online Retail ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ONLN | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.58% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $61M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.31% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 23 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +0.02% | +14.48% | |
| 1Y Return | +3.20% | +22.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.82% | +21.80% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -3.44% | +13.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.9% | 14.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -71.8% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 13, 2018 | Sep 7, 2010 |
ONLN vs VOO Performance
ProShares Online Retail ETF (ONLN) is a ETF from ProShares and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ONLN returned +3.20% while VOO returned +22.02%. Year to date, ONLN is up 0.02% versus a gain of 14.48% for VOO.
Over three years, ONLN compounded at +19.82% per year against +21.80% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are -3.44% and +13.36% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.61% annualized vs +5.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ONLN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.9% compared with 14.2% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -71.8% for ONLN and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.73. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ONLN charges 0.58% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $58 vs $3 annually, a gap of $55 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ONLN currently yields 0.31% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
ONLN and VOO share 4 holdings out of 523 unique holdings combined, representing a 3.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ONLN or VOO?
ONLN has an expense ratio of 0.58% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $55 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ONLN or VOO?
Over the past year ONLN returned +3.20% vs +22.02% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), ONLN annualized +5.10% vs +13.61% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ONLN or VOO?
ONLN has been the more volatile fund at 30.9% annualized versus 14.2% for VOO. Worst drawdown: ONLN -71.8% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both ONLN and VOO?
ONLN and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.73, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ONLN and VOO?
ONLN and VOO share 4 common holdings with a 3.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 523 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ONLN or VOO?
ONLN yields 0.31% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.