ONOF vs VTI
Global X Adaptive US Risk Management ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ONOF | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $144M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.24% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 505 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +9.56% | +13.48% | |
| 1Y Return | +15.59% | +19.90% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +12.62% | +20.94% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.11% | +11.75% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.1% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -26.2% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 12, 2021 | May 24, 2001 |
ONOF vs VTI Performance
Global X Adaptive US Risk Management ETF (ONOF) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ONOF returned +15.59% while VTI returned +19.90%. Year to date, ONOF is up 9.56% versus a gain of 13.48% for VTI.
Over three years, ONOF compounded at +12.62% per year against +20.94% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +8.11% and +11.75% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, ONOF has the edge at +10.52% annualized vs +8.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 14.1% for ONOF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -26.2% for ONOF and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.85. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ONOF charges 0.39% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $3 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ONOF currently yields 1.24% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
ONOF and VTI share 439 holdings out of 2843 unique holdings combined, representing a 82.6% weight overlap.
High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ONOF or VTI?
ONOF has an expense ratio of 0.39% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $36 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ONOF or VTI?
Over the past year ONOF returned +15.59% vs +19.90% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), ONOF annualized +10.52% vs +8.10% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ONOF or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 14.1% for ONOF. Worst drawdown: ONOF -26.2% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both ONOF and VTI?
ONOF and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.85, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ONOF and VTI?
ONOF and VTI share 439 common holdings with a 82.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2843 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ONOF or VTI?
ONOF yields 1.24% while VTI yields 1.07%, so ONOF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.