PABU vs VYM
iShares Paris-Aligned Climate Optimized MSCI USA ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, PABU or VYM?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. PABU led over 3Y and the full window, VYM over 1Y. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PABU | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.10% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $2.5B | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.90% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 97 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +9.66% | +9.71%Best |
| 1Y Return | +12.17% | +13.77%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.92%Best | +17.30% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.45% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.5% | 14.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -20.8% | -15.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 4.4 years | $16,876Best | $15,461 |
| Top 10 Weight | 47.8% | 26.1%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Feb 8, 2022 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 20, 2022 to Sep 24, 2026 (4.4 years).
PABU vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.4 years both funds cover.
PABU vs VYM Performance
iShares Paris-Aligned Climate Optimized MSCI USA ETF (PABU) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PABU returned +12.17% while VYM returned +13.77%. Year to date, PABU is up 9.66% versus a gain of 9.71% for VYM.
Over three years, PABU compounded at +19.92% per year against +17.30% for VYM. Across the full 4-year window we track, PABU has the edge at +12.63% annualized vs +10.41%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PABU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.5% compared with 14.0% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -20.8% for PABU and -15.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.71. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PABU charges 0.10% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $10 vs $4 annually, a gap of $6 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PABU currently yields 0.90% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
14.8% of PABU's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 14.9% of VYM's money is in holdings PABU also owns.
VYM and PABU share little of their money.
17 positions in common, counted across the 87 positions we hold weights for in PABU and 557 in VYM, against full books of 97 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 511 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for PABU (82.1% of the fund), and 70 for PABU that do not appear in VYM (85.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in PABU | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.63% | 7.35% | 3.72% |
| IBMInternational Business Machines Corp. | 2.32% | 0.85% | 1.47% |
| ORCLOracle Corp - Common | 1.91% | 0.90% | 1.01% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 0.11% | 1.80% | 1.69% |
| TXNTexas Instrument Inc | 0.70% | 1.02% | 0.32% |
| ADIAnalog Devices, Inc. | 0.88% | 0.73% | 0.15% |
| BLKBlackrock Funding Inc/De | 0.48% | 0.68% | 0.20% |
| AWKAmerican Water Works Co. Inc. | 0.81% | 0.11% | 0.70% |
| XYLXylem,Inc. | 0.80% | 0.11% | 0.69% |
| RPRXRoyalty Pharma | 0.71% | 0.10% | 0.61% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of PABU and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PABU or VYM?
PABU has an expense ratio of 0.10% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $6 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, PABU or VYM?
Over the past year PABU returned +12.17% vs +13.77% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), PABU annualized +12.63% vs +10.41% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, PABU or VYM?
PABU has been the more volatile fund at 16.5% annualized versus 14.0% for VYM. Worst drawdown: PABU -20.8% vs VYM -15.8%.
Should I hold both PABU and VYM?
PABU and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.71, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between PABU and VYM?
14.9% of VYM's money is in holdings PABU also owns. 14.9% of VYM's is in holdings PABU also owns. They hold 17 positions in common, counted across the 87 positions we hold weights for in PABU and 557 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, PABU or VYM?
PABU yields 0.90% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than PABU?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. PABU led over 3Y and the full window, VYM over 1Y. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.