PBUB vs QQQ
Portfolio Building Block US Banks ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, PBUB or QQQ?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
PBUB has a lower expense ratio. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 68.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PBUB | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.14%Best | 0.18% |
| AUM | $970,000 | $506.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.42% |
| Holdings | 19 | 321 |
| YTD Return | +2.25% | +13.24%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +12.27% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +24.03% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.36% |
| Top 10 Weight | 68.7% | 46.7%Best |
| Fund Family | Portfolio Building Block ETFs | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Sep 24, 2026 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
PBUB vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
PBUB vs QQQ Performance
Portfolio Building Block US Banks ETF (PBUB) is an ETF from Portfolio Building Block ETFs and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Year to date, PBUB is up 2.25% versus a gain of 13.24% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PBUB charges 0.14% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $14 vs $18 annually, a gap of $4 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PBUB currently yields 0.00% against 0.42% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 19 holdings in PBUB and 101 in QQQ, totalling 100.0% and 99.6% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 19 positions we hold weights for in PBUB and 101 in QQQ, against full books of 19 and 321.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 19 and 101 positions we hold weights for.
QQQ holds 94 positions PBUB does not, 97.2% of the fund.
Largest: NVDA 8.33%, AAPL 7.35%, MSFT 5.76%, MU 5.02%, AMD 4.17%
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of PBUB and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PBUB or QQQ?
PBUB has an expense ratio of 0.14% while QQQ charges 0.18%. PBUB is the cheaper option, by $4 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, PBUB or QQQ?
PBUB yields 0.00% while QQQ yields 0.42%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than PBUB?
PBUB has a lower expense ratio. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 68.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.