PRXG vs SCHD
Praxis Impact Large Cap Growth ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD delivered stronger 1-year returns. PRXG offers more diversification with 163 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PRXG | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.36% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $89M | $108.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.10% | 3.13% | |
| Holdings | 163 | 104 | |
| YTD Return | +8.79% | +28.70% | |
| 1Y Return | +15.82% | +31.07% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +40.82% | +16.88% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +176.16% | +10.20% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 4369.3% | 13.7% | |
| Max Drawdown | -99.8% | -33.4% | |
| Fund Family | Praxis Mutual Funds | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 7, 2025 | Oct 20, 2011 |
PRXG vs SCHD Performance
Praxis Impact Large Cap Growth ETF (PRXG) is a ETF from Praxis Mutual Funds and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year PRXG returned +15.82% while SCHD returned +31.07%. Year to date, PRXG is up 8.79% versus a gain of 28.70% for SCHD.
Over three years, PRXG compounded at +40.82% per year against +16.88% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are +176.16% and +10.20% respectively. Across the full 14-year window we track, PRXG has the edge at +20.72% annualized vs +11.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PRXG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 4369.3% compared with 13.7% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -99.8% for PRXG and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.25. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PRXG charges 0.36% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $36 vs $6 annually, a gap of $30 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PRXG currently yields 0.10% against 3.13% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
PRXG and SCHD share 5 holdings out of 255 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PRXG or SCHD?
PRXG has an expense ratio of 0.36% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $30 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PRXG or SCHD?
Over the past year PRXG returned +15.82% vs +31.07% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (14 years), PRXG annualized +20.72% vs +11.62% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PRXG or SCHD?
PRXG has been the more volatile fund at 4369.3% annualized versus 13.7% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: PRXG -99.8% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both PRXG and SCHD?
PRXG and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of -0.25, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between PRXG and SCHD?
PRXG and SCHD share 5 common holdings with a 0.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 255 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, PRXG or SCHD?
PRXG yields 0.10% while SCHD yields 3.13%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.