PRXG vs VTI
Praxis Impact Large Cap Growth ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PRXG | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.36% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $89M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.10% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 163 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +8.79% | +13.12% | |
| 1Y Return | +15.82% | +20.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +40.82% | +21.43% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +176.16% | +11.84% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 4369.3% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -99.8% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Praxis Mutual Funds | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 7, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
PRXG vs VTI Performance
Praxis Impact Large Cap Growth ETF (PRXG) is a ETF from Praxis Mutual Funds and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PRXG returned +15.82% while VTI returned +20.82%. Year to date, PRXG is up 8.79% versus a gain of 13.12% for VTI.
Over three years, PRXG compounded at +40.82% per year against +21.43% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +176.16% and +11.84% respectively. Across the full 14-year window we track, PRXG has the edge at +20.72% annualized vs +8.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PRXG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 4369.3% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -99.8% for PRXG and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.05. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PRXG charges 0.36% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $36 vs $3 annually, a gap of $33 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PRXG currently yields 0.10% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
PRXG and VTI share 152 holdings out of 2795 unique holdings combined, representing a 50.7% weight overlap.
High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PRXG or VTI?
PRXG has an expense ratio of 0.36% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $33 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PRXG or VTI?
Over the past year PRXG returned +15.82% vs +20.82% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (14 years), PRXG annualized +20.72% vs +8.08% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PRXG or VTI?
PRXG has been the more volatile fund at 4369.3% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: PRXG -99.8% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both PRXG and VTI?
PRXG and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of -0.05, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between PRXG and VTI?
PRXG and VTI share 152 common holdings with a 50.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2795 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, PRXG or VTI?
PRXG yields 0.10% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.