IVV vs PRXG
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Praxis Impact Large Cap Growth ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | PRXG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.36% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $89M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 0.10% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 163 | |
| YTD Return | +12.76% | +8.79% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.63% | +15.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.71% | +40.82% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.87% | +176.16% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 4369.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -99.8% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Praxis Mutual Funds | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Apr 7, 2025 |
IVV vs PRXG Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Praxis Impact Large Cap Growth ETF (PRXG) is a ETF from Praxis Mutual Funds. Over the past year IVV returned +20.63% while PRXG returned +15.82%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.76% versus a gain of 8.79% for PRXG.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.71% per year against +40.82% for PRXG; over five years the annualized figures are +12.87% and +176.16% respectively. Across the full 14-year window we track, PRXG has the edge at +20.72% annualized vs +6.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PRXG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 4369.3% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -99.8% for PRXG. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.05. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while PRXG charges 0.36%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $36 annually, a gap of $33 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 0.10% for PRXG.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and PRXG share 134 holdings out of 531 unique holdings combined, representing a 55.9% weight overlap.
High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or PRXG?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while PRXG charges 0.36%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $33 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or PRXG?
Over the past year IVV returned +20.63% vs +15.82% for PRXG, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (14 years), IVV annualized +6.99% vs +20.72% for PRXG. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or PRXG?
PRXG has been the more volatile fund at 4369.3% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs PRXG -99.8%.
Should I hold both IVV and PRXG?
IVV and PRXG have a monthly-return correlation of -0.05, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and PRXG?
IVV and PRXG share 134 common holdings with a 55.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 531 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or PRXG?
IVV yields 1.10% while PRXG yields 0.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.