PRXG vs VYM
Praxis Impact Large Cap Growth ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PRXG | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.36% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $89M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.10% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 163 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | +8.79% | +15.25% | |
| 1Y Return | +15.82% | +22.18% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +40.82% | +18.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +176.16% | +12.09% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 4369.3% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -99.8% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Praxis Mutual Funds | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 7, 2025 | Nov 10, 2006 |
PRXG vs VYM Performance
Praxis Impact Large Cap Growth ETF (PRXG) is a ETF from Praxis Mutual Funds and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PRXG returned +15.82% while VYM returned +22.18%. Year to date, PRXG is up 8.79% versus a gain of 15.25% for VYM.
Over three years, PRXG compounded at +40.82% per year against +18.83% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +176.16% and +12.09% respectively. Across the full 14-year window we track, PRXG has the edge at +20.72% annualized vs +7.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PRXG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 4369.3% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -99.8% for PRXG and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.14. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PRXG charges 0.36% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $36 vs $4 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PRXG currently yields 0.10% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
PRXG and VYM share 23 holdings out of 740 unique holdings combined, representing a 7.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PRXG or VYM?
PRXG has an expense ratio of 0.36% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $32 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PRXG or VYM?
Over the past year PRXG returned +15.82% vs +22.18% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (14 years), PRXG annualized +20.72% vs +7.03% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PRXG or VYM?
PRXG has been the more volatile fund at 4369.3% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: PRXG -99.8% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both PRXG and VYM?
PRXG and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of -0.14, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between PRXG and VYM?
PRXG and VYM share 23 common holdings with a 7.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 740 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, PRXG or VYM?
PRXG yields 0.10% while VYM yields 2.24%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.