PRXG vs QQQ
Praxis Impact Large Cap Growth ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. PRXG offers more diversification with 163 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PRXG | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.36% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $89M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.10% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 163 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +8.79% | +16.19% | |
| 1Y Return | +15.82% | +25.22% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +40.82% | +25.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +176.16% | +14.34% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 4369.3% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -99.8% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Praxis Mutual Funds | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 7, 2025 | Mar 10, 1999 |
PRXG vs QQQ Performance
Praxis Impact Large Cap Growth ETF (PRXG) is a ETF from Praxis Mutual Funds and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year PRXG returned +15.82% while QQQ returned +25.22%. Year to date, PRXG is up 8.79% versus a gain of 16.19% for QQQ.
Over three years, PRXG compounded at +40.82% per year against +25.47% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +176.16% and +14.34% respectively. Across the full 14-year window we track, PRXG has the edge at +20.72% annualized vs +13.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PRXG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 4369.3% compared with 30.6% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -99.8% for PRXG and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.01. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PRXG charges 0.36% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $36 vs $18 annually, a gap of $18 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PRXG currently yields 0.10% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
PRXG and QQQ share 58 holdings out of 204 unique holdings combined, representing a 58.5% weight overlap.
High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PRXG or QQQ?
PRXG has an expense ratio of 0.36% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $18 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PRXG or QQQ?
Over the past year PRXG returned +15.82% vs +25.22% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (14 years), PRXG annualized +20.72% vs +13.01% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PRXG or QQQ?
PRXG has been the more volatile fund at 4369.3% annualized versus 30.6% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: PRXG -99.8% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both PRXG and QQQ?
PRXG and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of -0.01, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between PRXG and QQQ?
PRXG and QQQ share 58 common holdings with a 58.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 204 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, PRXG or QQQ?
PRXG yields 0.10% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.