PSCC vs VTI
Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, PSCC or VTI?
Small Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 65.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PSCC | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.29% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $39M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.63% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 28 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +9.07% | +12.25%Best |
| 1Y Return | +3.90% | +15.74%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +0.74% | +22.45%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +1.22% | +12.32%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.2% | 14.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -35.4% | -35.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $10,625 | $17,877Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 65.3% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Apr 7, 2010 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 7, 2010 to Sep 29, 2026 (16.5 years).
PSCC vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 16.5 years both funds cover.
PSCC vs VTI Performance
Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PSCC returned +3.90% while VTI returned +15.74%. Year to date, PSCC is up 9.07% versus a gain of 12.25% for VTI.
Over three years, PSCC compounded at +0.74% per year against +22.45% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +1.22% and +12.32% respectively. Across the full 17-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +12.24% annualized vs +9.28%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PSCC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.2% compared with 14.9% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.4% for PSCC and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.64. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PSCC charges 0.29% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $29 vs $3 annually, a gap of $26 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PSCC currently yields 1.63% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
100.0% of PSCC's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.1% of VTI's money is in holdings PSCC also owns.
Most of PSCC is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
27 positions in common, counted across the 27 positions we hold weights for in PSCC and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 28 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,144 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for PSCC (97.4% of the fund), and 0 for PSCC that do not appear in VTI (0.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in PSCC | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CAGConagra Brands Inc. | 13.32% | 0.01% | 13.31% |
| LWLambwestonholdings Inc. | 11.66% | 0.01% | 11.65% |
| CPBCampbell Soup Co. | 7.16% | 0.01% | 7.15% |
| PSMTPricesmart Inc | 6.61% | 0.01% | 6.60% |
| CALMCal-maine Foods Inc | 5.40% | 0.01% | 5.39% |
| FRPTFreshpet, Inc. | 5.14% | 0.00% | 5.14% |
| CHEFChefs' Warehouse, Inc. | 4.75% | 0.01% | 4.74% |
| COCOVITA COCO CO INC/THE | 3.97% | 0.00% | 3.97% |
| IPARInter Parfums Inc | 3.68% | 0.00% | 3.68% |
| WDFCWd-40 Co. | 3.58% | 0.00% | 3.58% |
100.0% of PSCC is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PSCC or VTI?
PSCC has an expense ratio of 0.29% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $26 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, PSCC or VTI?
Over the past year PSCC returned +3.90% vs +15.74% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (17 years), PSCC annualized +9.28% vs +12.24% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, PSCC or VTI?
PSCC has been the more volatile fund at 16.2% annualized versus 14.9% for VTI. Worst drawdown: PSCC -35.4% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both PSCC and VTI?
PSCC and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.64, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between PSCC and VTI?
100.0% of PSCC's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.1% of VTI's is in holdings PSCC also owns. They hold 27 positions in common, counted across the 27 positions we hold weights for in PSCC and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, PSCC or VTI?
PSCC yields 1.63% while VTI yields 1.03%, so PSCC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than PSCC?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 65.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.