PSCC vs VYM
Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, PSCC or VYM?
Small Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 64.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PSCC | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.29% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $40M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.63% | 2.24% |
| Holdings | 28 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +17.56%Best | +14.82% |
| 1Y Return | +5.06% | +20.84%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +1.76% | +18.64%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +2.90% | +12.28%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.0% | 13.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -35.4%Best | -35.7% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $11,537 | $17,845Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 64.3% | 25.9%Best |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Apr 7, 2010 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 7, 2010 to Sep 4, 2026 (16.4 years).
PSCC vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 16.4 years both funds cover.
PSCC vs VYM Performance
Invesco S&P SmallCap Consumer Staples ETF (PSCC) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PSCC returned +5.06% while VYM returned +20.84%. Year to date, PSCC is up 17.56% versus a gain of 14.82% for VYM.
Over three years, PSCC compounded at +1.76% per year against +18.64% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +2.90% and +12.28% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +10.08% annualized vs +9.82%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PSCC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.0% compared with 13.2% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.4% for PSCC and -35.7% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.69. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PSCC charges 0.29% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $29 vs $4 annually, a gap of $25 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PSCC currently yields 1.63% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
56.6% of PSCC's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 0.1% of VYM's money is in holdings PSCC also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
12 positions in common, counted across the 28 positions we hold weights for in PSCC and 602 in VYM, against full books of 28 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 28 and 602 positions we hold weights for.
VYM holds 559 positions PSCC does not, 97.1% of the fund.
Largest: AVGO 7.29%, JPM 3.38%, JNJ 2.54%, XOM 2.36%, CAT 2.01%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in PSCC | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CAGConagra Brands Inc. | 12.22% | 0.03% | 12.19% |
| LWLamb Weston Holdings Inc. | 11.05% | 0.02% | 11.03% |
| CPBCampbell Soup Co. | 6.74% | 0.02% | 6.72% |
| CALMCal-maine Foods Inc | 5.68% | 0.01% | 5.67% |
| IPARInter Parfums Inc | 3.95% | 0.01% | 3.94% |
| WDFCWD-40 Company | 3.87% | 0.01% | 3.86% |
| FLOFlowers Foods Inc | 2.61% | 0.01% | 2.60% |
| REYNReynolds Consumer Products Inc. | 2.42% | 0.01% | 2.41% |
| ENREnergizer Holdings Inc | 2.21% | 0.01% | 2.20% |
| UVVUniversal Corp./va(uvv) | 2.21% | 0.01% | 2.20% |
56.6% of PSCC is already inside VYM.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PSCC or VYM?
PSCC has an expense ratio of 0.29% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $25 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, PSCC or VYM?
Over the past year PSCC returned +5.06% vs +20.84% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), PSCC annualized +9.82% vs +10.08% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, PSCC or VYM?
PSCC has been the more volatile fund at 16.0% annualized versus 13.2% for VYM. Worst drawdown: PSCC -35.4% vs VYM -35.7%.
Should I hold both PSCC and VYM?
PSCC and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.69, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between PSCC and VYM?
56.6% of PSCC's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 0.1% of VYM's is in holdings PSCC also owns. They hold 12 positions in common, counted across the 28 positions we hold weights for in PSCC and 602 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, PSCC or VYM?
PSCC yields 1.63% while VYM yields 2.24%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than PSCC?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 64.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.