PSEP vs SCHD
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - September vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Which is better, PSEP or SCHD?
Option Writing against Large Cap Value.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. PSEP is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PSEP | SCHD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79% | 0.06%Best |
| AUM | $815M | $112.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 3.00% |
| Holdings | 12 | 103 |
| YTD Return | +7.00% | +24.23%Best |
| 1Y Return | +9.55% | +27.90%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +12.22% | +15.55%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.75% | +9.97%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 8.4%Best | 16.5% |
| Max Drawdown | -17.9%Best | -33.4% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $15,923 | $16,083Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.8%Best | 41.8% |
| Fund Family | Innovator ETFs Trust | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Option Writing | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Aug 30, 2019 | Oct 20, 2011 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 3, 2019 to Sep 17, 2026 (7 years).
PSEP vs SCHD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 7 years both funds cover.
PSEP vs SCHD Performance
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - September (PSEP) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year PSEP returned +9.55% while SCHD returned +27.90%. Year to date, PSEP is up 7.00% versus a gain of 24.23% for SCHD.
Over three years, PSEP compounded at +12.22% per year against +15.55% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are +9.75% and +9.97% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +12.75% annualized vs +9.56%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SCHD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.5% compared with 8.4% for PSEP. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.9% for PSEP and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PSEP charges 0.79% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $6 annually, a gap of $73 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PSEP currently yields 0.00% against 3.00% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
7.8% of PSEP's money is in holdings SCHD also owns. 93.1% of SCHD's money is in holdings PSEP also owns.
Most of SCHD is already inside PSEP. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
44 positions in common, counted across the 491 positions we hold weights for in PSEP and 100 in SCHD, against full books of 12 and 103.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 55 positions for SCHD that do not appear in our book for PSEP (6.9% of the fund), and 443 for PSEP that do not appear in SCHD (90.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in PSEP | Weight in SCHD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MRKMerck & Company Inc | 0.56% | 4.77% | 4.21% |
| AMGNAmgen Inc. | 0.36% | 4.70% | 4.34% |
| ABTAbbott Laboratories | 0.28% | 4.69% | 4.41% |
| KOCoca Cola Co. | 0.51% | 4.17% | 3.66% |
| CVXChevron Corp | 0.59% | 4.02% | 3.43% |
| UNHUnitedhealth Group Incorporated | 0.54% | 3.82% | 3.28% |
| HDHome Depot Inc/The | 0.47% | 3.88% | 3.41% |
| PGProcter & Gamble Company | 0.51% | 3.83% | 3.32% |
| VZVerizon Communic | 0.31% | 3.97% | 3.66% |
| COPConocophillips Common Stock USD 0.01 | 0.25% | 3.94% | 3.69% |
93.1% of SCHD is already inside PSEP.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PSEP or SCHD?
PSEP has an expense ratio of 0.79% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $73 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, PSEP or SCHD?
Over the past year PSEP returned +9.55% vs +27.90% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), PSEP annualized +9.56% vs +12.75% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, PSEP or SCHD?
SCHD has been the more volatile fund at 16.5% annualized versus 8.4% for PSEP. Worst drawdown: PSEP -17.9% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both PSEP and SCHD?
PSEP and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between PSEP and SCHD?
93.1% of SCHD's money is in holdings PSEP also owns. 93.1% of SCHD's is in holdings PSEP also owns. They hold 44 positions in common, counted across the 491 positions we hold weights for in PSEP and 100 in SCHD.
Which pays a higher dividend, PSEP or SCHD?
PSEP yields 0.00% while SCHD yields 3.00%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHD better than PSEP?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. PSEP is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.