PWB vs VTI
Invesco Large Cap Growth ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. PWB delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PWB | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $2.5B | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 53 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +21.09% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +32.16% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +31.05% | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +15.29% | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.6% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -52.6% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 3, 2005 | May 24, 2001 |
PWB vs VTI Performance
Invesco Large Cap Growth ETF (PWB) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PWB returned +32.16% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, PWB is up 21.09% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Over three years, PWB compounded at +31.05% per year against +21.83% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +15.29% and +12.01% respectively. Across the full 22-year window we track, PWB has the edge at +12.10% annualized vs +8.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PWB has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.6% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -52.6% for PWB and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PWB charges 0.55% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $3 annually, a gap of $52 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PWB currently yields 0.00% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
PWB and VTI share 44 holdings out of 2794 unique holdings combined, representing a 28.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PWB or VTI?
PWB has an expense ratio of 0.55% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $52 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PWB or VTI?
Over the past year PWB returned +32.16% vs +22.35% for VTI, so PWB leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (22 years), PWB annualized +12.10% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PWB or VTI?
PWB has been the more volatile fund at 16.6% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: PWB -52.6% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both PWB and VTI?
PWB and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between PWB and VTI?
PWB and VTI share 44 common holdings with a 28.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2794 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, PWB or VTI?
PWB yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.