QBSF vs VOO
AllianzIM US Equity Buffer15 ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, QBSF or VOO?
Option Writing against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QBSF | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.64% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $59M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 5 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +4.30% | +12.25%Best |
| 1Y Return | +7.05% | +17.03%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.25% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.08% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 2.3%Best | 12.4% |
| Max Drawdown | -1.6%Best | -8.9% |
| $10,000 over 1.2 years | $10,920 | $12,463Best |
| Fund Family | AllianzIM | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Option Writing | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 30, 2025 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 1, 2025 to Sep 17, 2026 (1.2 years).
QBSF vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.2 years both funds cover.
QBSF vs VOO Performance
AllianzIM US Equity Buffer15 ETF (QBSF) is an ETF from AllianzIM and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QBSF returned +7.05% while VOO returned +17.03%. Year to date, QBSF is up 4.30% versus a gain of 12.25% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.4% compared with 2.3% for QBSF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -1.6% for QBSF and -8.9% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.87. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QBSF charges 0.64% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $64 vs $3 annually, a gap of $61 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QBSF currently yields 0.00% against 1.04% for VOO.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of QBSF and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QBSF or VOO?
QBSF has an expense ratio of 0.64% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $61 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QBSF or VOO?
Over the past year QBSF returned +7.05% vs +17.03% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), QBSF annualized +7.61% vs +20.14% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QBSF or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 12.4% annualized versus 2.3% for QBSF. Worst drawdown: QBSF -1.6% vs VOO -8.9%.
Should I hold both QBSF and VOO?
QBSF and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.87, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, QBSF or VOO?
QBSF yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than QBSF?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.