QCMU vs QQQ
Direxion Daily QCOM Bull 2X ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QCMU | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.07% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $22M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.38% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 9 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | -34.82% | +16.64% | |
| 1Y Return | -22.85% | +27.27% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +25.96% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.54% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 136.3% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -68.7% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 25, 2025 | Mar 10, 1999 |
QCMU vs QQQ Performance
Direxion Daily QCOM Bull 2X ETF (QCMU) is a ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year QCMU returned -22.85% while QQQ returned +27.27%. Year to date, QCMU is down 34.82% versus a gain of 16.64% for QQQ.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QCMU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 136.3% compared with 30.6% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -68.7% for QCMU and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.87. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QCMU charges 1.07% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $107 vs $18 annually, a gap of $89 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QCMU currently yields 4.38% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
QCMU and QQQ share 1 holdings out of 106 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QCMU | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| QCOM | 15.94% | 0.73% | 15.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QCMU or QQQ?
QCMU has an expense ratio of 1.07% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $89 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QCMU or QQQ?
Over the past year QCMU returned -22.85% vs +27.27% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), QCMU annualized -23.72% vs +13.03% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QCMU or QQQ?
QCMU has been the more volatile fund at 136.3% annualized versus 30.6% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: QCMU -68.7% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both QCMU and QQQ?
QCMU and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.87, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QCMU and QQQ?
QCMU and QQQ share 1 common holdings with a 0.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 106 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QCMU or QQQ?
QCMU yields 4.38% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so QCMU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.