QCMU vs VOO
Direxion Daily QCOM Bull 2X ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QCMU | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.07% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $22M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.38% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 9 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | -30.64% | +14.27% | |
| 1Y Return | -22.31% | +21.79% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.19% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 137.1% | 14.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -68.7% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 25, 2025 | Sep 7, 2010 |
QCMU vs VOO Performance
Direxion Daily QCOM Bull 2X ETF (QCMU) is a ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QCMU returned -22.31% while VOO returned +21.79%. Year to date, QCMU is down 30.64% versus a gain of 14.27% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QCMU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 137.1% compared with 14.2% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -68.7% for QCMU and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QCMU charges 1.07% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $107 vs $3 annually, a gap of $104 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QCMU currently yields 4.38% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
QCMU and VOO share 1 holdings out of 509 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QCMU | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| QCOM | 15.94% | 0.30% | 15.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QCMU or VOO?
QCMU has an expense ratio of 1.07% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $104 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QCMU or VOO?
Over the past year QCMU returned -22.31% vs +21.79% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), QCMU annualized -19.79% vs +13.59% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QCMU or VOO?
QCMU has been the more volatile fund at 137.1% annualized versus 14.2% for VOO. Worst drawdown: QCMU -68.7% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both QCMU and VOO?
QCMU and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QCMU and VOO?
QCMU and VOO share 1 common holdings with a 0.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 509 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QCMU or VOO?
QCMU yields 4.38% while VOO yields 1.08%, so QCMU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.