QCMU vs VTI
Direxion Daily QCOM Bull 2X ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QCMU | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.07% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $22M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.38% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 9 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -30.64% | +14.82% | |
| 1Y Return | -22.31% | +22.43% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.93% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.34% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 137.1% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -68.7% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 25, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
QCMU vs VTI Performance
Direxion Daily QCOM Bull 2X ETF (QCMU) is a ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QCMU returned -22.31% while VTI returned +22.43%. Year to date, QCMU is down 30.64% versus a gain of 14.82% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QCMU has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 137.1% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -68.7% for QCMU and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QCMU charges 1.07% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $107 vs $3 annually, a gap of $104 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QCMU currently yields 4.38% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
QCMU and VTI share 1 holdings out of 2791 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QCMU | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| QCOM | 15.94% | 0.27% | 15.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QCMU or VTI?
QCMU has an expense ratio of 1.07% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $104 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QCMU or VTI?
Over the past year QCMU returned -22.31% vs +22.43% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), QCMU annualized -19.79% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QCMU or VTI?
QCMU has been the more volatile fund at 137.1% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: QCMU -68.7% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both QCMU and VTI?
QCMU and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QCMU and VTI?
QCMU and VTI share 1 common holdings with a 0.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2791 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QCMU or VTI?
QCMU yields 4.38% while VTI yields 1.07%, so QCMU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.