QDTY vs QMMY

QDTY vs QMMY

Which is better, QDTY or QMMY?

QDTY has been ahead.

QMMY has a lower expense ratio. QDTY led over 1Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: QMMYHigher Returns: QDTY

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricQDTYQMMY
Expense Ratio1.17%0.90%Best
AUM$28M$155M
Dividend Yield36.64%0.00%
Holdings1010
YTD Return+16.70%Best+9.09%
1Y Return+20.73%Best+11.11%
Volatility (annualized)18.9%9.3%Best
Max Drawdown-20.2%-12.8%Best
$10,000 over 1.7 years$14,562Best$12,383
Fund FamilyYieldMax ETFFirst Trust Portfolios (US)
CategoryAlternativeAlternative
StyleMulti AlternativeMulti Alternative
InceptionFeb 12, 2025May 17, 2024

Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 13, 2025 to Oct 9, 2026 (1.7 years).

QDTY vs QMMY growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.7 years both funds cover.

Compare QDTY against instead:QDTY vs SPYQDTY vs QQQQDTY vs VOOQDTY vs VTIQMMY against:QMMY vs VXUS

QDTY vs QMMY Performance

YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTY) is an ETF from YieldMax ETF and FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer ETF - May (QMMY) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year QDTY returned +20.73% while QMMY returned +11.11%. Year to date, QDTY is up 16.70% versus a gain of 9.09% for QMMY.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

QDTY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.9% compared with 9.3% for QMMY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -20.2% for QDTY and -12.8% for QMMY. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

QDTY charges 1.17% per year while QMMY charges 0.90%. On a $10,000 position that is $117 vs $90 annually, a gap of $27 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QDTY currently yields 36.64% against 0.00% for QMMY.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of QDTY and QMMY you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

QDTYQMMY

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, QDTY or QMMY?

QDTY has an expense ratio of 1.17% while QMMY charges 0.90%. QMMY is the cheaper option, by $27 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, QDTY or QMMY?

Over the past year QDTY returned +20.73% vs +11.11% for QMMY, so QDTY leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), QDTY annualized +24.74% vs +13.40% for QMMY. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, QDTY or QMMY?

QDTY has been the more volatile fund at 18.9% annualized versus 9.3% for QMMY. Worst drawdown: QDTY -20.2% vs QMMY -12.8%.

Should I hold both QDTY and QMMY?

QDTY and QMMY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, QDTY or QMMY?

QDTY yields 36.64% while QMMY yields 0.00%, so QDTY currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is QMMY better than QDTY?

QMMY has a lower expense ratio. QDTY led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.