QDVO vs SPY
Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
Quick Verdict
SPY has a lower expense ratio. SPY delivered stronger 1-year returns. SPY offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QDVO | SPY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.56% | 0.09% | |
| AUM | $753M | $821.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 11.89% | 1.01% | |
| Holdings | 48 | 505 | |
| YTD Return | +8.69% | +12.68% | |
| 1Y Return | +17.12% | +21.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.98% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.89% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.8% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -18.6% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Amplify ETFs | State Street Investment Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 22, 2024 | Jan 22, 1993 |
QDVO vs SPY Performance
Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO) is a ETF from Amplify ETFs and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is a ETF from State Street Investment Management. Over the past year QDVO returned +17.12% while SPY returned +21.82%. Year to date, QDVO is up 8.69% versus a gain of 12.68% for SPY.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SPY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 13.8% for QDVO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.6% for QDVO and -56.5% for SPY. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QDVO charges 0.56% per year while SPY charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $56 vs $9 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QDVO currently yields 11.89% against 1.01% for SPY.
Holdings Overlap
QDVO and SPY share 36 holdings out of 508 unique holdings combined, representing a 48.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QDVO or SPY?
QDVO has an expense ratio of 0.56% while SPY charges 0.09%. SPY is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QDVO or SPY?
Over the past year QDVO returned +17.12% vs +21.82% for SPY, so SPY leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), QDVO annualized +20.35% vs +8.81% for SPY. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QDVO or SPY?
SPY has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 13.8% for QDVO. Worst drawdown: QDVO -18.6% vs SPY -56.5%.
Should I hold both QDVO and SPY?
QDVO and SPY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between QDVO and SPY?
QDVO and SPY share 36 common holdings with a 48.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 508 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QDVO or SPY?
QDVO yields 11.89% while SPY yields 1.01%, so QDVO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.