QFRD vs SPY
Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF R&D Leaders ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
Which is better, QFRD or SPY?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
SPY has a lower expense ratio. QFRD is less concentrated, with 37.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QFRD | SPY |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.09%Best |
| AUM | $2M | $814.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.11% | 1.01% |
| Holdings | 51 | 505 |
| YTD Return | +18.47%Best | +13.34% |
| 1Y Return | - | +19.97% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.20% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.81% |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.1%Best | 38.0% |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | State Street Investment Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jan 12, 2026 | Jan 22, 1993 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
QFRD vs SPY growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
QFRD vs SPY Performance
Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF R&D Leaders ETF (QFRD) is an ETF from Pacer ETFs and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is an ETF from State Street Investment Management. Year to date, QFRD is up 18.47% versus a gain of 13.34% for SPY.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QFRD charges 0.49% per year while SPY charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $9 annually, a gap of $40 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QFRD currently yields 0.11% against 1.01% for SPY.
Holdings Overlap
97.2% of QFRD's money is in holdings SPY also owns. 25.8% of SPY's money is in holdings QFRD also owns.
Most of QFRD is already inside SPY. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
49 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in QFRD and 504 in SPY, against full books of 51 and 505.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 50 and 504 positions we hold weights for.
SPY holds 447 positions QFRD does not, 73.7% of the fund.
Largest: AAPL 6.83%, MSFT 5.50%, AMZN 4.08%, GOOGL 3.33%, MU 1.51%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QFRD | Weight in SPY | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 1.34% | 7.71% | 6.37% |
| DDOGDatadog Inc | 6.86% | 0.14% | 6.72% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 3.85% | 1.27% | 2.58% |
| CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings Inc. Class A | 4.11% | 0.32% | 3.79% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 1.43% | 2.97% | 1.54% |
| PANWPalo Alto Networks, Inc | 3.81% | 0.45% | 3.36% |
| METAMeta Platform Inc | 2.01% | 1.94% | 0.07% |
| WDAYWorkday, Inc., Class A | 3.80% | 0.05% | 3.75% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 1.18% | 2.67% | 1.49% |
| INCYIncyte Corp. | 3.50% | 0.03% | 3.47% |
97.2% of QFRD is already inside SPY.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QFRD or SPY?
QFRD has an expense ratio of 0.49% while SPY charges 0.09%. SPY is the cheaper option, by $40 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between QFRD and SPY?
97.2% of QFRD's money is in holdings SPY also owns. 25.8% of SPY's is in holdings QFRD also owns. They hold 49 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in QFRD and 504 in SPY.
Which pays a higher dividend, QFRD or SPY?
QFRD yields 0.11% while SPY yields 1.01%, so SPY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SPY better than QFRD?
SPY has a lower expense ratio. QFRD is less concentrated, with 37.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.