QFRD vs QQQ
Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF R&D Leaders ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, QFRD or QQQ?
QQQ costs less.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QFRD is less concentrated, with 37.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QFRD | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $2M | $486.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.11% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 51 | 107 |
| YTD Return | +16.48% | +17.44%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +24.69% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +24.76% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.22% |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.1%Best | 46.5% |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jan 12, 2026 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
QFRD vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
QFRD vs QQQ Performance
Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF R&D Leaders ETF (QFRD) is an ETF from Pacer ETFs and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Year to date, QFRD is up 16.48% versus a gain of 17.44% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QFRD charges 0.49% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $18 annually, a gap of $31 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QFRD currently yields 0.11% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
61.3% of QFRD's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 34.8% of QQQ's money is in holdings QFRD also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
28 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in QFRD and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 51 and 107.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 50 and 102 positions we hold weights for.
QQQ holds 66 positions QFRD does not, 62.0% of the fund.
Largest: AAPL 7.27%, MSFT 5.76%, AMZN 4.67%, MU 4.43%, GOOGL 3.36%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QFRD | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 1.34% | 8.44% | 7.10% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 3.85% | 3.45% | 0.40% |
| DDOGDatadog Inc. Class A | 6.86% | 0.41% | 6.45% |
| PANWPalo Alto Networks Inc - Common | 3.81% | 1.30% | 2.51% |
| CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings Inc - A | 4.11% | 0.94% | 3.17% |
| METAMeta Platform Inc | 2.01% | 2.78% | 0.77% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 1.43% | 3.16% | 1.73% |
| GOOGAlphabet, Inc., Class C | 1.18% | 3.13% | 1.95% |
| WDAYWorkday Inc | 3.80% | 0.15% | 3.65% |
| CDNSCadence Design Systems Inc. | 3.25% | 0.41% | 2.84% |
61.3% of QFRD is already inside QQQ.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QFRD or QQQ?
QFRD has an expense ratio of 0.49% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $31 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between QFRD and QQQ?
61.3% of QFRD's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 34.8% of QQQ's is in holdings QFRD also owns. They hold 28 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in QFRD and 102 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, QFRD or QQQ?
QFRD yields 0.11% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than QFRD?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QFRD is less concentrated, with 37.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.