QFRD vs VTI

QFRD vs VTI

Which is better, QFRD or VTI?

Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.

VTI has a lower expense ratio.

Lower Fees: VTI

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricQFRDVTI
Expense Ratio0.49%0.03%Best
AUM$2M$666.9B
Dividend Yield0.11%1.07%
Holdings513,543
YTD Return+18.47%Best+13.59%
1Y Return-+20.00%
3Y Return (annualized)-+20.95%
5Y Return (annualized)-+11.81%
Fund FamilyPacer ETFsVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Blend
InceptionJan 12, 2026May 24, 2001

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.

QFRD vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

QFRD vs VTI Performance

Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF R&D Leaders ETF (QFRD) is an ETF from Pacer ETFs and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, QFRD is up 18.47% versus a gain of 13.59% for VTI.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

QFRD charges 0.49% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $3 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QFRD currently yields 0.11% against 1.07% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

QFRD already in VTI94.1%

At least 94.1% of QFRD's money is in holdings VTI also owns.

Stated as a floor: for VTI, our book for it covers 92.3% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.

Most of QFRD is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

47 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in QFRD and 2,788 in VTI, against full books of 51 and 3,543.

What only one of them owns

Measured across the 50 and 2,788 positions we hold weights for.

VTI holds 638 positions QFRD does not, 69.6% of the fund.

Largest: AAPL 5.84%, MSFT 3.81%, AMZN 3.17%, GOOGL 2.88%, MU 1.79%

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in QFRDWeight in VTIDifference
NVDANvidia Corp.1.34%6.32%4.98%
DDOGDatadog Inc. Class A6.86%0.12%6.74%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc3.85%1.30%2.55%
CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings Inc - A4.11%0.25%3.86%
PANWPalo Alto Networks Inc - Common3.81%0.38%3.43%
AVGOBroadcom Inc1.43%2.46%1.03%
WDAYWorkday Inc3.80%0.03%3.77%
METAMeta Platform Inc 2.01%1.70%0.31%
LLYEli Lilly & Co.2.19%1.40%0.79%
INCYIncyte Corp.3.50%0.03%3.47%

94.1% of QFRD is already inside VTI.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

QFRDVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, QFRD or VTI?

QFRD has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $46 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between QFRD and VTI?

At least 94.1% of QFRD's money is in holdings VTI also owns. Our book for VTI is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 47 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in QFRD and 2,788 in VTI.

Which pays a higher dividend, QFRD or VTI?

QFRD yields 0.11% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than QFRD?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.