QGRW vs VXUS
WisdomTree US Quality Growth Fund vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QGRW | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.28% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $2.7B | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.08% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 100 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +16.46% | +14.07% | |
| 1Y Return | +26.19% | +27.24% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +28.39% | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.14% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.2% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -24.4% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | WisdomTree Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 15, 2022 | Jan 26, 2011 |
QGRW vs VXUS Performance
WisdomTree US Quality Growth Fund (QGRW) is a ETF from WisdomTree Investments and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QGRW returned +26.19% while VXUS returned +27.24%. Year to date, QGRW is up 16.46% versus a gain of 14.07% for VXUS.
Over three years, QGRW compounded at +28.39% per year against +19.27% for VXUS. Across the full 4-year window we track, QGRW has the edge at +32.93% annualized vs +4.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QGRW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.2% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.4% for QGRW and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.57. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QGRW charges 0.28% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $28 vs $5 annually, a gap of $23 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QGRW currently yields 0.08% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
QGRW and VXUS share 1 holdings out of 7958 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QGRW | Weight in VXUS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ORCL | 2.01% | 0.00% | 2.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QGRW or VXUS?
QGRW has an expense ratio of 0.28% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $23 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QGRW or VXUS?
Over the past year QGRW returned +26.19% vs +27.24% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), QGRW annualized +32.93% vs +4.83% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QGRW or VXUS?
QGRW has been the more volatile fund at 18.2% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: QGRW -24.4% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both QGRW and VXUS?
QGRW and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.57, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QGRW and VXUS?
QGRW and VXUS share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7958 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QGRW or VXUS?
QGRW yields 0.08% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.