QGRW vs VOO
WisdomTree US Quality Growth Fund vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. QGRW delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QGRW | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.28% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $3.0B | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.08% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 102 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +13.52% | +12.63% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.22% | +20.89% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.67% | +21.06% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.62% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.0% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -24.4% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | WisdomTree Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 15, 2022 | Sep 7, 2010 |
QGRW vs VOO Performance
WisdomTree US Quality Growth Fund (QGRW) is a ETF from WisdomTree Investments and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QGRW returned +23.22% while VOO returned +20.89%. Year to date, QGRW is up 13.52% versus a gain of 12.63% for VOO.
Over three years, QGRW compounded at +25.67% per year against +21.06% for VOO. Across the full 4-year window we track, QGRW has the edge at +31.38% annualized vs +13.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QGRW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.0% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.4% for QGRW and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QGRW charges 0.28% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $28 vs $3 annually, a gap of $25 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QGRW currently yields 0.08% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
QGRW and VOO share 78 holdings out of 526 unique holdings combined, representing a 46.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QGRW or VOO?
QGRW has an expense ratio of 0.28% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $25 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QGRW or VOO?
Over the past year QGRW returned +23.22% vs +20.89% for VOO, so QGRW leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), QGRW annualized +31.38% vs +13.44% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QGRW or VOO?
QGRW has been the more volatile fund at 18.0% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: QGRW -24.4% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both QGRW and VOO?
QGRW and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between QGRW and VOO?
QGRW and VOO share 78 common holdings with a 46.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 526 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QGRW or VOO?
QGRW yields 0.08% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.