QGRW vs VOO
WisdomTree US Quality Growth Fund vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, QGRW or VOO?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. QGRW led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QGRW | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.28% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $3.2B | $1.0T |
| Dividend Yield | 0.07% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 102 | 506 |
| YTD Return | +18.39%Best | +13.59% |
| 1Y Return | +20.41%Best | +16.33% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +30.40%Best | +23.81% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.02% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.7% | 12.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -24.4% | -18.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.8 years | $28,769Best | $20,875 |
| Top 10 Weight | 57.1% | 37.6%Best |
| Fund Family | WisdomTree Investments | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 15, 2022 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 15, 2022 to Oct 2, 2026 (3.8 years).
QGRW vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.8 years both funds cover.
QGRW vs VOO Performance
WisdomTree US Quality Growth Fund (QGRW) is an ETF from WisdomTree Investments and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QGRW returned +20.41% while VOO returned +16.33%. Year to date, QGRW is up 18.39% versus a gain of 13.59% for VOO.
Over three years, QGRW compounded at +30.40% per year against +23.81% for VOO. Across the full 4-year window we track, QGRW has the edge at +32.06% annualized vs +21.37%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QGRW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.7% compared with 12.4% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.4% for QGRW and -18.7% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QGRW charges 0.28% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $28 vs $3 annually, a gap of $25 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QGRW currently yields 0.07% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
94.5% of QGRW's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 49.8% of VOO's money is in holdings QGRW also owns.
Most of QGRW is already inside VOO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
The two holdings books were reported 46 days apart, QGRW as of Sep 15, 2026 and VOO as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
75 positions in common, counted across the 98 positions we hold weights for in QGRW and 494 in VOO, against full books of 102 and 506.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 412 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for QGRW (49.4% of the fund), and 21 for QGRW that do not appear in VOO (4.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QGRW | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 11.96% | 7.55% | 4.41% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 9.63% | 5.36% | 4.27% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 7.16% | 4.13% | 3.03% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 7.85% | 3.24% | 4.61% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 3.24% | 7.05% | 3.81% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 6.51% | 1.90% | 4.61% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.90% | 2.86% | 0.04% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 3.15% | 1.41% | 1.74% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 2.50% | 1.44% | 1.06% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 2.20% | 1.21% | 0.99% |
94.5% of QGRW is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QGRW or VOO?
QGRW has an expense ratio of 0.28% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $25 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QGRW or VOO?
Over the past year QGRW returned +20.41% vs +16.33% for VOO, so QGRW leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), QGRW annualized +32.06% vs +21.37% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QGRW or VOO?
QGRW has been the more volatile fund at 17.7% annualized versus 12.4% for VOO. Worst drawdown: QGRW -24.4% vs VOO -18.7%.
Should I hold both QGRW and VOO?
QGRW and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between QGRW and VOO?
94.5% of QGRW's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 49.8% of VOO's is in holdings QGRW also owns. They hold 75 positions in common, counted across the 98 positions we hold weights for in QGRW and 494 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, QGRW or VOO?
QGRW yields 0.07% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than QGRW?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. QGRW led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.