IVV vs QGRW
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs WisdomTree US Quality Growth Fund
Which is better, IVV or QGRW?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. QGRW led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | QGRW |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.28% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $2.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.07% |
| Holdings | 508 | 102 |
| YTD Return | +12.39% | +14.52%Best |
| 1Y Return | +16.61% | +17.81%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.38% | +27.15%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.51% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.5%Best | 18.0% |
| Max Drawdown | -18.8%Best | -24.4% |
| $10,000 over 3.8 years | $20,810 | $28,121Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | WisdomTree Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Dec 15, 2022 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 15, 2022 to Sep 18, 2026 (3.8 years).
IVV vs QGRW growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.8 years both funds cover.
IVV vs QGRW Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and WisdomTree US Quality Growth Fund (QGRW) is an ETF from WisdomTree Investments. Over the past year IVV returned +16.61% while QGRW returned +17.81%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.39% versus a gain of 14.52% for QGRW.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.38% per year against +27.15% for QGRW. Across the full 4-year window we track, QGRW has the edge at +31.27% annualized vs +21.27%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QGRW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.0% compared with 12.5% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.8% for IVV and -24.4% for QGRW. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while QGRW charges 0.28%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $28 annually, a gap of $25 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.07% for QGRW.
Holdings Overlap
At least 47.4% of IVV's money is in holdings QGRW also owns.
Stated as a floor: for QGRW, our book for it covers 91.9% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
76 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 98 in QGRW, against full books of 508 and 102.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in QGRW | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.07% | 12.71% | 4.64% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.69% | 9.46% | 3.77% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.84% | 7.19% | 3.35% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.02% | 3.16% | 3.86% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 1.90% | 5.79% | 3.89% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.65% | 3.08% | 0.43% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 1.38% | 3.21% | 1.83% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.63% | 2.58% | 0.95% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 1.16% | 2.04% | 0.88% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 0.95% | 2.02% | 1.07% |
47.4% of IVV is already inside QGRW.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or QGRW?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while QGRW charges 0.28%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $25 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or QGRW?
Over the past year IVV returned +16.61% vs +17.81% for QGRW, so QGRW leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), IVV annualized +21.27% vs +31.27% for QGRW. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or QGRW?
QGRW has been the more volatile fund at 18.0% annualized versus 12.5% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -18.8% vs QGRW -24.4%.
Should I hold both IVV and QGRW?
IVV and QGRW have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and QGRW?
At least 47.4% of IVV's money is in holdings QGRW also owns. Our book for QGRW is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 76 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 98 in QGRW.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or QGRW?
IVV yields 1.06% while QGRW yields 0.07%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QGRW better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. QGRW led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.