QGRW vs VTI
WisdomTree US Quality Growth Fund vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. QGRW delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QGRW | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.28% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $3.0B | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.08% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 100 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +13.84% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +24.70% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +27.62% | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.1% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -24.4% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | WisdomTree Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 15, 2022 | May 24, 2001 |
QGRW vs VTI Performance
WisdomTree US Quality Growth Fund (QGRW) is a ETF from WisdomTree Investments and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QGRW returned +24.70% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, QGRW is up 13.84% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Over three years, QGRW compounded at +27.62% per year against +21.83% for VTI. Across the full 4-year window we track, QGRW has the edge at +31.81% annualized vs +8.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QGRW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.1% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.4% for QGRW and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QGRW charges 0.28% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $28 vs $3 annually, a gap of $25 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QGRW currently yields 0.08% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
QGRW and VTI share 89 holdings out of 2796 unique holdings combined, representing a 43.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QGRW or VTI?
QGRW has an expense ratio of 0.28% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $25 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QGRW or VTI?
Over the past year QGRW returned +24.70% vs +22.35% for VTI, so QGRW leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), QGRW annualized +31.81% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QGRW or VTI?
QGRW has been the more volatile fund at 18.1% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: QGRW -24.4% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both QGRW and VTI?
QGRW and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between QGRW and VTI?
QGRW and VTI share 89 common holdings with a 43.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2796 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QGRW or VTI?
QGRW yields 0.08% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.