QGRW vs QQQ
WisdomTree US Quality Growth Fund vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QGRW | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.28% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $3.0B | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.08% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 100 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +13.84% | +16.64% | |
| 1Y Return | +24.70% | +27.27% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +27.62% | +25.96% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.54% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.1% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -24.4% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | WisdomTree Investments | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 15, 2022 | Mar 10, 1999 |
QGRW vs QQQ Performance
WisdomTree US Quality Growth Fund (QGRW) is a ETF from WisdomTree Investments and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year QGRW returned +24.70% while QQQ returned +27.27%. Year to date, QGRW is up 13.84% versus a gain of 16.64% for QQQ.
Over three years, QGRW compounded at +27.62% per year against +25.96% for QQQ. Across the full 4-year window we track, QGRW has the edge at +31.81% annualized vs +13.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 18.1% for QGRW. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.4% for QGRW and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.97. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QGRW charges 0.28% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $28 vs $18 annually, a gap of $10 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QGRW currently yields 0.08% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
QGRW and QQQ share 35 holdings out of 165 unique holdings combined, representing a 53.6% weight overlap.
High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QGRW or QQQ?
QGRW has an expense ratio of 0.28% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $10 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QGRW or QQQ?
Over the past year QGRW returned +24.70% vs +27.27% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), QGRW annualized +31.81% vs +13.03% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QGRW or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 18.1% for QGRW. Worst drawdown: QGRW -24.4% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both QGRW and QQQ?
QGRW and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.97, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between QGRW and QQQ?
QGRW and QQQ share 35 common holdings with a 53.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 165 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QGRW or QQQ?
QGRW yields 0.08% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.