QGRW vs QQQ
WisdomTree US Quality Growth Fund vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, QGRW or QQQ?
Nearly the same fund. QQQ costs less.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QGRW led over 3Y and the full window, QQQ over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QGRW | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.28% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $3.1B | $437.3B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.08% | 0.43% |
| Holdings | 203 | 208 |
| YTD Return | +10.28% | +12.98%Best |
| 1Y Return | +9.02% | +11.59%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.46%Best | +23.05% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.74% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.1% | 17.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -24.4% | -22.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.9 years | $26,736Best | $25,486 |
| Fund Family | WisdomTree Investments | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Dec 15, 2022 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 15, 2022 to Nov 11, 2026 (3.9 years).
QGRW vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.9 years both funds cover.
QGRW vs QQQ Performance
WisdomTree US Quality Growth Fund (QGRW) is an ETF from WisdomTree Investments and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year QGRW returned +9.02% while QQQ returned +11.59%. Year to date, QGRW is up 10.28% versus a gain of 12.98% for QQQ.
Over three years, QGRW compounded at +24.46% per year against +23.05% for QQQ. Across the full 4-year window we track, QGRW has the edge at +28.68% annualized vs +27.11%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QGRW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.1% compared with 17.7% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.4% for QGRW and -22.8% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.98. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QGRW charges 0.28% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $28 vs $18 annually, a gap of $10 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QGRW currently yields 0.08% against 0.43% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
At least 57.4% of QQQ's money is in holdings QGRW also owns.
Stated as a floor: for QGRW, our book for it covers 91.9% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
39 positions in common, counted across the 98 positions we hold weights for in QGRW and 101 in QQQ, against full books of 203 and 208.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QGRW | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 11.95% | 8.05% | 3.90% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 10.04% | 6.16% | 3.88% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 7.01% | 4.23% | 2.78% |
| AAPLApple Inc | 3.23% | 7.68% | 4.45% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 2.44% | 4.47% | 2.03% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 2.44% | 3.90% | 1.46% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.78% | 2.52% | 0.26% |
| PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc. | 1.50% | 1.96% | 0.46% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 1.23% | 1.84% | 0.61% |
| MRVLMarvell Technology Inc | 1.56% | 0.90% | 0.66% |
57.4% of QQQ is already inside QGRW.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QGRW or QQQ?
QGRW has an expense ratio of 0.28% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $10 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QGRW or QQQ?
Over the past year QGRW returned +9.02% vs +11.59% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), QGRW annualized +28.68% vs +27.11% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QGRW or QQQ?
QGRW has been the more volatile fund at 18.1% annualized versus 17.7% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: QGRW -24.4% vs QQQ -22.8%.
Should I hold both QGRW and QQQ?
QGRW and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.98, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between QGRW and QQQ?
At least 57.4% of QQQ's money is in holdings QGRW also owns. Our book for QGRW is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 39 positions in common, counted across the 98 positions we hold weights for in QGRW and 101 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, QGRW or QQQ?
QGRW yields 0.08% while QQQ yields 0.43%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than QGRW?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QGRW led over 3Y and the full window, QQQ over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.98. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.