QMOM vs VOO
Alpha Architect US Quantitative Momentum ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, QMOM or VOO?
Mid Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. QMOM is less concentrated, with 22.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QMOM | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.28% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $424M | $1.0T |
| Dividend Yield | 0.48% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 121 | 506 |
| YTD Return | +11.68% | +14.88%Best |
| 1Y Return | +15.22% | +17.30%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.74% | +23.04%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.71% | +13.97%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.7% | 15.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -39.1% | -34.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $15,894 | $19,229Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 22.6%Best | 37.6% |
| Fund Family | Alpha Architect | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 1, 2015 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 2, 2015 to Oct 9, 2026 (10.9 years).
QMOM vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 10.9 years both funds cover.
QMOM vs VOO Performance
Alpha Architect US Quantitative Momentum ETF (QMOM) is an ETF from Alpha Architect and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QMOM returned +15.22% while VOO returned +17.30%. Year to date, QMOM is up 11.68% versus a gain of 14.88% for VOO.
Over three years, QMOM compounded at +20.74% per year against +23.04% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +9.71% and +13.97% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.77% annualized vs +11.12%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QMOM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.7% compared with 15.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -39.1% for QMOM and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QMOM charges 0.28% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $28 vs $3 annually, a gap of $25 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QMOM currently yields 0.48% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
31.1% of QMOM's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 2.4% of VOO's money is in holdings QMOM also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
15 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in QMOM and 494 in VOO, against full books of 121 and 506.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 472 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for QMOM (96.8% of the fund), and 30 for QMOM that do not appear in VOO (60.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QMOM | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| DELLDell Technologies Inc | 2.63% | 0.18% | 2.45% |
| CATCaterpillar, Inc. | 2.11% | 0.58% | 1.53% |
| HPEHewlett Packard Enterprise Co | 2.46% | 0.10% | 2.36% |
| VLOValero Energy | 2.16% | 0.14% | 2.02% |
| PANWPalo Alto Networks, Inc | 1.85% | 0.42% | 1.43% |
| CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings Inc | 1.94% | 0.30% | 1.64% |
| MPCMarathon Petroleum Corp | 2.09% | 0.14% | 1.95% |
| KEYSKeysight Technologies Inc. | 2.13% | 0.08% | 2.05% |
| NUENucor Corp. | 2.07% | 0.09% | 1.98% |
| JBHTJb Hunt Transport Services Inc. | 2.11% | 0.03% | 2.08% |
31.1% of QMOM is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QMOM or VOO?
QMOM has an expense ratio of 0.28% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $25 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QMOM or VOO?
Over the past year QMOM returned +15.22% vs +17.30% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), QMOM annualized +11.12% vs +13.77% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QMOM or VOO?
QMOM has been the more volatile fund at 21.7% annualized versus 15.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: QMOM -39.1% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both QMOM and VOO?
QMOM and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between QMOM and VOO?
31.1% of QMOM's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 2.4% of VOO's is in holdings QMOM also owns. They hold 15 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in QMOM and 494 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, QMOM or VOO?
QMOM yields 0.48% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than QMOM?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. QMOM is less concentrated, with 22.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.