QQQ vs RACK
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs VanEck Data Center Supply Chain ETF
Which is better, QQQ or RACK?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Value.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, RACK over the full window. RACK is less concentrated, with 44.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | RACK |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18%Best | 0.50% |
| AUM | $483.5B | $60M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 107 | 51 |
| YTD Return | +15.21%Best | -12.83% |
| 1Y Return | +19.78%Best | -12.83% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.58% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.93% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.2%Best | 229121403.5% |
| Max Drawdown | -35.1% | - |
| $10,000 over 12.6 years | $81,002 | $93,085Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 46.5% | 44.6%Best |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | VanEck |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Jun 1, 2026 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 12.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 18, 2014 to Sep 16, 2026 (12.6 years).
QQQ vs RACK growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 12.6 years both funds cover.
QQQ vs RACK Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and VanEck Data Center Supply Chain ETF (RACK) is an ETF from VanEck. Over the past year QQQ returned +19.78% while RACK returned -12.83%. Year to date, QQQ is up 15.21% versus a loss of 12.83% for RACK.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RACK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 229121403.5% compared with 18.2% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.04. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while RACK charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $50 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 0.00% for RACK.
Holdings Overlap
25.9% of QQQ's money is in holdings RACK also owns. 39.6% of RACK's money is in holdings QQQ also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
17 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 50 in RACK, against full books of 107 and 51.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 28 positions for RACK that do not appear in our book for QQQ (51.8% of the fund), and 79 for QQQ that do not appear in RACK (71.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QQQ | Weight in RACK | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.44% | 4.96% | 3.48% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 4.43% | 4.79% | 0.36% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.16% | 4.55% | 1.39% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 3.45% | 2.65% | 0.80% |
| CEGConstellation Energy Corporation Com | 0.42% | 5.30% | 4.88% |
| SNDKSandisk Corp/De | 0.88% | 3.45% | 2.57% |
| STXSeagate Technology Holdings Plc | 0.83% | 2.89% | 2.06% |
| WDCWestern Digital Corp Company Guar 11/28 3 | 0.79% | 2.41% | 1.62% |
| MRVLMarvell Technology Group Ltd. | 0.81% | 1.01% | 0.20% |
| QCOMQualcomm Inc. | 0.73% | 1.05% | 0.32% |
39.6% of RACK is already inside QQQ.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or RACK?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while RACK charges 0.50%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $32 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QQQ or RACK?
Over the past year QQQ returned +19.78% vs -12.83% for RACK, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (13 years), QQQ annualized +18.06% vs +19.37% for RACK. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QQQ or RACK?
RACK has been the more volatile fund at 229121403.5% annualized versus 18.2% for QQQ.
Should I hold both QQQ and RACK?
QQQ and RACK have a monthly-return correlation of -0.04, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and RACK?
39.6% of RACK's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 39.6% of RACK's is in holdings QQQ also owns. They hold 17 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 50 in RACK.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or RACK?
QQQ yields 0.44% while RACK yields 0.00%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RACK better than QQQ?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, RACK over the full window. RACK is less concentrated, with 44.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.