QQQ vs RACK
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs VanEck Data Center Supply Chain ETF
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | RACK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.50% | |
| AUM | $496.3B | $54M | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 0.00% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 52 | |
| YTD Return | +16.19% | -9.97% | |
| 1Y Return | +25.22% | -9.97% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.47% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.34% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.6% | 230991813.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.0% | -100.0% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | VanEck | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Jun 1, 2026 |
QQQ vs RACK Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and VanEck Data Center Supply Chain ETF (RACK) is a ETF from VanEck. Over the past year QQQ returned +25.22% while RACK returned -9.97%. Year to date, QQQ is up 16.19% versus a loss of 9.97% for RACK.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RACK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 230991813.3% compared with 30.6% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for QQQ and -100.0% for RACK. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.04. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while RACK charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $50 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 0.00% for RACK.
Holdings Overlap
QQQ and RACK share 18 holdings out of 134 unique holdings combined, representing a 21.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or RACK?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while RACK charges 0.50%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $32 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQ or RACK?
Over the past year QQQ returned +25.22% vs -9.97% for RACK, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (13 years), QQQ annualized +13.01% vs +19.78% for RACK. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQ or RACK?
RACK has been the more volatile fund at 230991813.3% annualized versus 30.6% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: QQQ -83.0% vs RACK -100.0%.
Should I hold both QQQ and RACK?
QQQ and RACK have a monthly-return correlation of -0.04, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and RACK?
QQQ and RACK share 18 common holdings with a 21.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 134 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or RACK?
QQQ yields 0.44% while RACK yields 0.00%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.