QQQ vs RDVY
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF
Which is better, QQQ or RDVY?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Value.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. RDVY is less concentrated, with 23.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | RDVY |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18%Best | 0.47% |
| AUM | $483.5B | $25.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 0.83% |
| Holdings | 107 | 144 |
| YTD Return | +17.95%Best | +13.57% |
| 1Y Return | +21.77%Best | +19.58% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.63%Best | +20.64% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +15.24%Best | +12.77% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.2% | 17.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -35.1%Best | -40.6% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $20,324Best | $18,238 |
| Top 10 Weight | 46.5% | 23.7%Best |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | First Trust Portfolios (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Jan 6, 2014 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 7, 2014 to Sep 18, 2026 (12.7 years).
QQQ vs RDVY growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 12.7 years both funds cover.
QQQ vs RDVY Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year QQQ returned +21.77% while RDVY returned +19.58%. Year to date, QQQ is up 17.95% versus a gain of 13.57% for RDVY.
Over three years, QQQ compounded at +25.63% per year against +20.64% for RDVY; over five years the annualized figures are +15.24% and +12.77% respectively. Across the full 13-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +18.42% annualized vs +12.20%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.2% compared with 17.8% for RDVY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.1% for QQQ and -40.6% for RDVY. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.73. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while RDVY charges 0.47%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $47 annually, a gap of $29 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 0.83% for RDVY.
Holdings Overlap
42.3% of QQQ's money is in holdings RDVY also owns. 33.1% of RDVY's money is in holdings QQQ also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
19 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 71 in RDVY, against full books of 107 and 144.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 51 positions for RDVY that do not appear in our book for QQQ (65.2% of the fund), and 77 for QQQ that do not appear in RDVY (55.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QQQ | Weight in RDVY | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.44% | 2.10% | 6.34% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.27% | 1.57% | 5.70% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.76% | 1.96% | 3.80% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 4.43% | 1.51% | 2.92% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 3.36% | 2.01% | 1.35% |
| AMATApplied Materials, Inc. | 1.86% | 2.96% | 1.10% |
| LRCXLrcx Uw Equity | 1.69% | 3.06% | 1.37% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.78% | 1.52% | 1.26% |
| COSTCostco Wholesale Corp. | 1.84% | 1.74% | 0.10% |
| KLACKla Corp | 1.11% | 2.40% | 1.29% |
42.3% of QQQ is already inside RDVY.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or RDVY?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while RDVY charges 0.47%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $29 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QQQ or RDVY?
Over the past year QQQ returned +21.77% vs +19.58% for RDVY, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (13 years), QQQ annualized +18.42% vs +12.20% for RDVY. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QQQ or RDVY?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 18.2% annualized versus 17.8% for RDVY. Worst drawdown: QQQ -35.1% vs RDVY -40.6%.
Should I hold both QQQ and RDVY?
QQQ and RDVY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.73, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and RDVY?
42.3% of QQQ's money is in holdings RDVY also owns. 33.1% of RDVY's is in holdings QQQ also owns. They hold 19 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 71 in RDVY.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or RDVY?
QQQ yields 0.44% while RDVY yields 0.83%, so RDVY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RDVY better than QQQ?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. RDVY is less concentrated, with 23.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.