QQQ vs REGS

QQQ vs REGS

Which is better, QQQ or REGS?

QQQ has been ahead.

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 51.9%.

Lower Fees: QQQHigher Returns (1Y): QQQLess Concentrated: QQQ

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricQQQREGS
Expense Ratio0.18%Best0.35%
AUM$483.5B-
Dividend Yield0.44%0.00%
Holdings10762
YTD Return+17.95%Best+13.46%
1Y Return+21.77%-
3Y Return (annualized)+25.63%-
5Y Return (annualized)+15.24%-
Top 10 Weight46.5%Best51.9%
Fund FamilyInvesco (US)Columbia Threadneedle Investments
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Growth
InceptionMar 10, 1999Mar 16, 2026

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

QQQ vs REGS growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

QQQ vs REGS Performance

Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Columbia Large Cap Growth ETF (REGS) is an ETF from Columbia Threadneedle Investments. Year to date, QQQ is up 17.95% versus a gain of 13.46% for REGS.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

QQQ charges 0.18% per year while REGS charges 0.35%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $35 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 0.00% for REGS.

Holdings Overlap

QQQ already in REGS55.5%
REGS already in QQQ62.0%

55.5% of QQQ's money is in holdings REGS also owns. 62.0% of REGS's money is in holdings QQQ also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

20 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 60 in REGS, against full books of 107 and 62.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 38 positions for REGS that do not appear in our book for QQQ (35.7% of the fund), and 76 for QQQ that do not appear in REGS (42.0%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in QQQWeight in REGSDifference
NVDANvidia Corp8.44%12.12%3.68%
AAPLApple, Inc7.27%8.77%1.50%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp5.76%5.39%0.37%
AVGOBroadcom Inc3.16%6.33%3.17%
GOOGAlphabet Inc3.13%5.22%2.09%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc4.67%2.24%2.43%
METAMeta Platforms Inc2.78%4.07%1.29%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.4.43%1.52%2.91%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc3.45%2.46%0.99%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A3.36%1.83%1.53%

62.0% of REGS is already inside QQQ.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

QQQREGS

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, QQQ or REGS?

QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while REGS charges 0.35%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $17 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and REGS?

62.0% of REGS's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 62.0% of REGS's is in holdings QQQ also owns. They hold 20 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 60 in REGS.

Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or REGS?

QQQ yields 0.44% while REGS yields 0.00%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is REGS better than QQQ?

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 51.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.