QQQ vs RJCA
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs RJ ClariVest Capital Appreciation ETF
Which is better, QQQ or RJCA?
QQQ has been ahead.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 53.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | RJCA |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18%Best | 0.61% |
| AUM | $483.5B | $590M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 107 | 71 |
| YTD Return | +17.95%Best | +3.37% |
| 1Y Return | +21.77% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.63% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +15.24% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 46.5%Best | 53.5% |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Carillon Family of Funds |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Mar 21, 2006 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
QQQ vs RJCA growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
QQQ vs RJCA Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and RJ ClariVest Capital Appreciation ETF (RJCA) is an ETF from Carillon Family of Funds. Year to date, QQQ is up 17.95% versus a gain of 3.37% for RJCA.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while RJCA charges 0.61%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $61 annually, a gap of $43 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 0.00% for RJCA.
Holdings Overlap
65.4% of QQQ's money is in holdings RJCA also owns. 65.8% of RJCA's money is in holdings QQQ also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
25 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 71 in RJCA, against full books of 107 and 71.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 102 and 71 positions we hold weights for.
QQQ holds 71 positions RJCA does not, 32.1% of the fund.
Largest: INTC 2.23%, LRCX 1.69%, PANW 1.30%, TXN 1.12%, LIN 1.00%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QQQ | Weight in RJCA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.44% | 13.34% | 4.90% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.27% | 8.64% | 1.37% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.76% | 6.18% | 0.42% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.16% | 5.57% | 2.41% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 3.36% | 4.92% | 1.56% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 3.13% | 3.82% | 0.69% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.67% | 1.96% | 2.71% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 4.43% | 1.00% | 3.43% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.78% | 2.58% | 0.20% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 3.45% | 1.22% | 2.23% |
65.8% of RJCA is already inside QQQ.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or RJCA?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while RJCA charges 0.61%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $43 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and RJCA?
65.8% of RJCA's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 65.8% of RJCA's is in holdings QQQ also owns. They hold 25 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 71 in RJCA.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or RJCA?
QQQ yields 0.44% while RJCA yields 0.00%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RJCA better than QQQ?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 53.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.