QQQ vs RSPS
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF
Which is better, QQQ or RSPS?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Value.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. RSPS is less concentrated, with 33.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | RSPS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18%Best | 0.40% |
| AUM | $483.5B | $248M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 2.86% |
| Holdings | 107 | 37 |
| YTD Return | +17.21%Best | +4.81% |
| 1Y Return | +22.10%Best | +4.02% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.27%Best | +0.97% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.60%Best | +1.51% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.7% | 13.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -53.5% | -37.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $19,766Best | $10,778 |
| Top 10 Weight | 46.5% | 33.0%Best |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Nov 1, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 7, 2006 to Sep 17, 2026 (19.9 years).
QQQ vs RSPS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 19.9 years both funds cover.
QQQ vs RSPS Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Staples ETF (RSPS) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year QQQ returned +22.10% while RSPS returned +4.02%. Year to date, QQQ is up 17.21% versus a gain of 4.81% for RSPS.
Over three years, QQQ compounded at +25.27% per year against +0.97% for RSPS; over five years the annualized figures are +14.60% and +1.51% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +15.43% annualized vs +6.66%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.7% compared with 13.0% for RSPS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -53.5% for QQQ and -37.5% for RSPS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.57. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while RSPS charges 0.40%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $40 annually, a gap of $22 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 2.86% for RSPS.
Holdings Overlap
6.2% of QQQ's money is in holdings RSPS also owns. 19.8% of RSPS's money is in holdings QQQ also owns.
RSPS and QQQ share little of their money.
7 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 34 in RSPS, against full books of 107 and 37.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 102 and 34 positions we hold weights for.
QQQ holds 89 positions RSPS does not, 91.4% of the fund.
Largest: NVDA 8.44%, AAPL 7.27%, MSFT 5.76%, AMZN 4.67%, MU 4.43%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QQQ | Weight in RSPS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| WMTWalmart, Inc. | 2.41% | 2.52% | 0.11% |
| COSTCostco Wholesale Corp. | 1.84% | 2.77% | 0.93% |
| PEPPepsico Inc. | 0.83% | 2.81% | 1.98% |
| MNSTMonster Beverage Corp. | 0.41% | 2.91% | 2.50% |
| KHCKraft Heinz Co. | 0.13% | 3.09% | 2.96% |
| MDLZMondelez International Inc Com A Npv | 0.35% | 2.80% | 2.45% |
| KDPKeurig Dr Pepper Inc (kdp Us) | 0.18% | 2.91% | 2.73% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of QQQ and RSPS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or RSPS?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while RSPS charges 0.40%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $22 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QQQ or RSPS?
Over the past year QQQ returned +22.10% vs +4.02% for RSPS, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), QQQ annualized +15.43% vs +6.66% for RSPS. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QQQ or RSPS?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 18.7% annualized versus 13.0% for RSPS. Worst drawdown: QQQ -53.5% vs RSPS -37.5%.
Should I hold both QQQ and RSPS?
QQQ and RSPS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.57, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and RSPS?
19.8% of RSPS's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 19.8% of RSPS's is in holdings QQQ also owns. They hold 7 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 34 in RSPS.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or RSPS?
QQQ yields 0.44% while RSPS yields 2.86%, so RSPS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RSPS better than QQQ?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. RSPS is less concentrated, with 33.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.