QQQ vs RSSL
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Global X Russell 2000 ETF
Quick Verdict
RSSL has a lower expense ratio. RSSL delivered stronger 1-year returns. RSSL offers more diversification with 1,981 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | RSSL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.08% | |
| AUM | $496.3B | $1.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 1.24% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 1,981 | |
| YTD Return | +16.23% | +20.21% | |
| 1Y Return | +26.23% | +33.33% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.75% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.78% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.6% | 18.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.0% | -28.2% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Global X by mirae Asset | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Jun 4, 2024 |
QQQ vs RSSL Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Global X Russell 2000 ETF (RSSL) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset. Over the past year QQQ returned +26.23% while RSSL returned +33.33%. Year to date, QQQ is up 16.23% versus a gain of 20.21% for RSSL.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 18.4% for RSSL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for QQQ and -28.2% for RSSL. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.65. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while RSSL charges 0.08%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $8 annually, a gap of $10 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 1.24% for RSSL.
Holdings Overlap
QQQ and RSSL share 0 holdings out of 1490 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or RSSL?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while RSSL charges 0.08%. RSSL is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $10 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQ or RSSL?
Over the past year QQQ returned +26.23% vs +33.33% for RSSL, so RSSL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), QQQ annualized +13.02% vs +19.46% for RSSL. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQ or RSSL?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 18.4% for RSSL. Worst drawdown: QQQ -83.0% vs RSSL -28.2%.
Should I hold both QQQ and RSSL?
QQQ and RSSL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.65, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and RSSL?
QQQ and RSSL share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1490 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or RSSL?
QQQ yields 0.44% while RSSL yields 1.24%, so RSSL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.