RSSL vs VYM
Global X Russell 2000 ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. RSSL delivered stronger 1-year returns. RSSL offers more diversification with 1387 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RSSL | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.08% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $1.5B | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.23% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 1,918 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +21.50% | +16.16% | |
| 1Y Return | +37.80% | +26.05% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.43% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.21% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.4% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -28.2% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 4, 2024 | Nov 10, 2006 |
RSSL vs VYM Performance
Global X Russell 2000 ETF (RSSL) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RSSL returned +37.80% while VYM returned +26.05%. Year to date, RSSL is up 21.50% versus a gain of 16.16% for VYM.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RSSL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.4% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -28.2% for RSSL and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RSSL charges 0.08% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $8 vs $4 annually, a gap of $4 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RSSL currently yields 1.23% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
RSSL and VYM share 153 holdings out of 1792 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RSSL or VYM?
RSSL has an expense ratio of 0.08% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $4 per year of difference.
Which performed better, RSSL or VYM?
Over the past year RSSL returned +37.80% vs +26.05% for VYM, so RSSL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), RSSL annualized +20.29% vs +7.09% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, RSSL or VYM?
RSSL has been the more volatile fund at 18.4% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: RSSL -28.2% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both RSSL and VYM?
RSSL and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between RSSL and VYM?
RSSL and VYM share 153 common holdings with a 1.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1792 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, RSSL or VYM?
RSSL yields 1.23% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.