RSSL vs VXUS
Global X Russell 2000 ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. RSSL delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 8,747 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RSSL | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.08% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $1.5B | $158.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.24% | 2.59% | |
| Holdings | 1,981 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +18.80% | +14.51% | |
| 1Y Return | +27.06% | +26.56% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.95% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +8.87% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.1% | 15.0% | |
| Max Drawdown | -28.2% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 4, 2024 | Jan 26, 2011 |
RSSL vs VXUS Performance
Global X Russell 2000 ETF (RSSL) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RSSL returned +27.06% while VXUS returned +26.56%. Year to date, RSSL is up 18.80% versus a gain of 14.51% for VXUS.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RSSL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.1% compared with 15.0% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -28.2% for RSSL and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.57. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RSSL charges 0.08% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $8 vs $5 annually, a gap of $3 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RSSL currently yields 1.24% against 2.59% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
RSSL and VXUS share 12 holdings out of 9641 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RSSL or VXUS?
RSSL has an expense ratio of 0.08% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $3 per year of difference.
Which performed better, RSSL or VXUS?
Over the past year RSSL returned +27.06% vs +26.56% for VXUS, so RSSL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), RSSL annualized +18.50% vs +4.83% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, RSSL or VXUS?
RSSL has been the more volatile fund at 18.1% annualized versus 15.0% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: RSSL -28.2% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both RSSL and VXUS?
RSSL and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.57, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between RSSL and VXUS?
RSSL and VXUS share 12 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 9641 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, RSSL or VXUS?
RSSL yields 1.24% while VXUS yields 2.59%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.