QQQ vs SCHB
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Schwab US Broad Market ETF
Which is better, QQQ or SCHB?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
SCHB has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. SCHB is less concentrated, with 33.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | SCHB |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $483.5B | $44.3B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 1.02% |
| Holdings | 107 | 2,354 |
| YTD Return | +17.95%Best | +12.39% |
| 1Y Return | +21.77%Best | +16.06% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.63%Best | +21.03% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +15.24%Best | +12.42% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.6% | 14.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -35.1%Best | -35.3% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $20,324Best | $17,956 |
| Top 10 Weight | 46.5% | 33.8%Best |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Nov 3, 2009 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 3, 2009 to Sep 18, 2026 (16.9 years).
QQQ vs SCHB growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 16.9 years both funds cover.
QQQ vs SCHB Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Schwab US Broad Market ETF (SCHB) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year QQQ returned +21.77% while SCHB returned +16.06%. Year to date, QQQ is up 17.95% versus a gain of 12.39% for SCHB.
Over three years, QQQ compounded at +25.63% per year against +21.03% for SCHB; over five years the annualized figures are +15.24% and +12.42% respectively. Across the full 17-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +18.71% annualized vs +12.89%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.6% compared with 14.8% for SCHB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.1% for QQQ and -35.3% for SCHB. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while SCHB charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $3 annually, a gap of $15 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 1.02% for SCHB.
Holdings Overlap
96.4% of QQQ's money is in holdings SCHB also owns. 48.5% of SCHB's money is in holdings QQQ also owns.
Most of QQQ is already inside SCHB. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
93 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 2,345 in SCHB, against full books of 107 and 2,354.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,062 positions for SCHB that do not appear in our book for QQQ (49.1% of the fund), and 3 for QQQ that do not appear in SCHB (1.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QQQ | Weight in SCHB | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.44% | 7.10% | 1.34% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.27% | 6.11% | 1.16% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.76% | 4.84% | 0.92% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.67% | 3.57% | 1.10% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 3.36% | 2.84% | 0.52% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 3.16% | 2.65% | 0.51% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 4.43% | 1.35% | 3.08% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 3.13% | 2.28% | 0.85% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.78% | 1.73% | 1.05% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 3.45% | 1.05% | 2.40% |
96.4% of QQQ is already inside SCHB.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or SCHB?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while SCHB charges 0.03%. SCHB is the cheaper option, by $15 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QQQ or SCHB?
Over the past year QQQ returned +21.77% vs +16.06% for SCHB, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (17 years), QQQ annualized +18.71% vs +12.89% for SCHB. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QQQ or SCHB?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 17.6% annualized versus 14.8% for SCHB. Worst drawdown: QQQ -35.1% vs SCHB -35.3%.
Should I hold both QQQ and SCHB?
QQQ and SCHB have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and SCHB?
96.4% of QQQ's money is in holdings SCHB also owns. 48.5% of SCHB's is in holdings QQQ also owns. They hold 93 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 2,345 in SCHB.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or SCHB?
QQQ yields 0.44% while SCHB yields 1.02%, so SCHB currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHB better than QQQ?
SCHB has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. SCHB is less concentrated, with 33.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.