QQQ vs SFGV
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Sequoia Global Value ETF
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. SFGV offers more diversification with 527 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | SFGV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.33% | |
| AUM | $496.3B | $1.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 2.34% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 527 | |
| YTD Return | +16.19% | +16.71% | |
| 1Y Return | +25.22% | +23.21% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.47% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.34% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.6% | 10.8% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.0% | -15.2% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | EA Series Trust | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Jan 16, 2024 |
QQQ vs SFGV Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Sequoia Global Value ETF (SFGV) is a ETF from EA Series Trust. Over the past year QQQ returned +25.22% while SFGV returned +23.21%. Year to date, QQQ is up 16.19% versus a gain of 16.71% for SFGV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 10.8% for SFGV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for QQQ and -15.2% for SFGV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.40. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while SFGV charges 0.33%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $33 annually, a gap of $15 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 2.34% for SFGV.
Holdings Overlap
QQQ and SFGV share 19 holdings out of 609 unique holdings combined, representing a 9.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or SFGV?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while SFGV charges 0.33%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $15 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQ or SFGV?
Over the past year QQQ returned +25.22% vs +23.21% for SFGV, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), QQQ annualized +13.01% vs +17.91% for SFGV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQ or SFGV?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 10.8% for SFGV. Worst drawdown: QQQ -83.0% vs SFGV -15.2%.
Should I hold both QQQ and SFGV?
QQQ and SFGV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.40, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and SFGV?
QQQ and SFGV share 19 common holdings with a 9.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 609 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or SFGV?
QQQ yields 0.44% while SFGV yields 2.34%, so SFGV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.