QQQ vs SFGV
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Sequoia Global Value ETF
Which is better, QQQ or SFGV?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window. SFGV is less concentrated, with 46.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | SFGV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18%Best | 0.33% |
| AUM | $483.5B | $1.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 2.29% |
| Holdings | 107 | 527 |
| YTD Return | +15.94%Best | +14.49% |
| 1Y Return | +20.44%Best | +19.45% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.86% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.26% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.3% | 10.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -22.8% | -15.2%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.7 years | $17,565Best | $15,160 |
| Top 10 Weight | 46.5% | 46.0%Best |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | EA Series Trust |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Jan 16, 2024 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 18, 2024 to Sep 14, 2026 (2.7 years).
QQQ vs SFGV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.7 years both funds cover.
QQQ vs SFGV Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Sequoia Global Value ETF (SFGV) is an ETF from EA Series Trust. Over the past year QQQ returned +20.44% while SFGV returned +19.45%. Year to date, QQQ is up 15.94% versus a gain of 14.49% for SFGV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.3% compared with 10.7% for SFGV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.8% for QQQ and -15.2% for SFGV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.41. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while SFGV charges 0.33%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $33 annually, a gap of $15 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 2.29% for SFGV.
Holdings Overlap
18.0% of QQQ's money is in holdings SFGV also owns. 10.3% of SFGV's money is in holdings QQQ also owns.
QQQ and SFGV share little of their money.
19 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 527 in SFGV, against full books of 107 and 527.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 488 positions for SFGV that do not appear in our book for QQQ (89.2% of the fund), and 77 for QQQ that do not appear in SFGV (79.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QQQ | Weight in SFGV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.27% | 1.84% | 5.43% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 2.10% | 0.96% | 1.14% |
| LINLinde Plc Ordinary Shares | 1.00% | 0.86% | 0.14% |
| PEPPepsico Inc. | 0.83% | 0.81% | 0.02% |
| GILDGilead Sciences | 0.72% | 0.91% | 0.19% |
| QCOMQualcomm Inc. | 0.73% | 0.87% | 0.14% |
| BKNGBooking Holdings, Inc. | 0.70% | 0.78% | 0.08% |
| AMGNAmgen Inc. | 0.97% | 0.39% | 0.58% |
| ROSTRoss Stores, Inc. | 0.36% | 0.55% | 0.19% |
| CSXCsx Corp. | 0.42% | 0.36% | 0.06% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of QQQ and SFGV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or SFGV?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while SFGV charges 0.33%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $15 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QQQ or SFGV?
Over the past year QQQ returned +20.44% vs +19.45% for SFGV, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QQQ or SFGV?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 17.3% annualized versus 10.7% for SFGV. Worst drawdown: QQQ -22.8% vs SFGV -15.2%.
Should I hold both QQQ and SFGV?
QQQ and SFGV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.41, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and SFGV?
18.0% of QQQ's money is in holdings SFGV also owns. 10.3% of SFGV's is in holdings QQQ also owns. They hold 19 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 527 in SFGV.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or SFGV?
QQQ yields 0.44% while SFGV yields 2.29%, so SFGV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SFGV better than QQQ?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window. SFGV is less concentrated, with 46.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.