IVV vs SFGV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Sequoia Global Value ETF
Which is better, IVV or SFGV?
Each has led over a different period.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over the full window, SFGV over 1Y. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | SFGV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.33% |
| AUM | $882.6B | $1.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 2.29% |
| Holdings | 508 | 528 |
| YTD Return | +14.90%Best | +13.18% |
| 1Y Return | +17.30% | +17.85%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.04% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.97% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.8% | 10.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -18.8% | -15.2%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.7 years | $16,832Best | $14,832 |
| Top 10 Weight | 38.1%Best | 46.0% |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | EA Series Trust |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jan 16, 2024 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 18, 2024 to Oct 9, 2026 (2.7 years).
IVV vs SFGV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.7 years both funds cover.
IVV vs SFGV Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Sequoia Global Value ETF (SFGV) is an ETF from EA Series Trust. Over the past year IVV returned +17.30% while SFGV returned +17.85%. Year to date, IVV is up 14.90% versus a gain of 13.18% for SFGV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 11.8% compared with 10.8% for SFGV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.8% for IVV and -15.2% for SFGV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while SFGV charges 0.33%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $33 annually, a gap of $30 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 2.29% for SFGV.
Holdings Overlap
33.0% of IVV's money is in holdings SFGV also owns. 49.5% of SFGV's money is in holdings IVV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
181 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 526 in SFGV, against full books of 508 and 528.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 327 positions for SFGV that do not appear in our book for IVV (50.1% of the fund), and 317 for IVV that do not appear in SFGV (66.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in SFGV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.39% | 1.92% | 5.47% |
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 1.04% | 1.47% | 0.43% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 0.97% | 1.44% | 0.47% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 1.44% | 0.56% | 0.88% |
| CVXChevron Corp | 0.61% | 1.13% | 0.52% |
| MRKMerck & Company Inc | 0.54% | 1.10% | 0.56% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 0.67% | 0.95% | 0.28% |
| CATCaterpillar, Inc. | 0.57% | 0.96% | 0.39% |
| KOCoca Cola Co. | 0.52% | 1.00% | 0.48% |
| PGProcter & Gamble Company | 0.51% | 0.96% | 0.45% |
49.5% of SFGV is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or SFGV?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SFGV charges 0.33%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $30 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or SFGV?
Over the past year IVV returned +17.30% vs +17.85% for SFGV, so SFGV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or SFGV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 11.8% annualized versus 10.8% for SFGV. Worst drawdown: IVV -18.8% vs SFGV -15.2%.
Should I hold both IVV and SFGV?
IVV and SFGV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and SFGV?
49.5% of SFGV's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 49.5% of SFGV's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 181 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 526 in SFGV.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or SFGV?
IVV yields 1.06% while SFGV yields 2.29%, so SFGV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SFGV better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over the full window, SFGV over 1Y. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.