IVV vs SFGV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Sequoia Global Value ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. SFGV delivered stronger 1-year returns. SFGV offers more diversification with 527 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | SFGV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.33% | |
| AUM | $907.0B | $1.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 2.34% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 527 | |
| YTD Return | +12.76% | +16.68% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.14% | +23.27% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.69% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.00% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 10.8% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -15.2% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | EA Series Trust | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jan 16, 2024 |
IVV vs SFGV Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Sequoia Global Value ETF (SFGV) is a ETF from EA Series Trust. Over the past year IVV returned +20.14% while SFGV returned +23.27%. Year to date, IVV is up 12.76% versus a gain of 16.68% for SFGV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 10.8% for SFGV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -15.2% for SFGV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while SFGV charges 0.33%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $33 annually, a gap of $30 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.10% against 2.34% for SFGV.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and SFGV share 180 holdings out of 851 unique holdings combined, representing a 24.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or SFGV?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SFGV charges 0.33%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $30 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or SFGV?
Over the past year IVV returned +20.14% vs +23.27% for SFGV, so SFGV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), IVV annualized +6.99% vs +17.88% for SFGV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or SFGV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 10.8% for SFGV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs SFGV -15.2%.
Should I hold both IVV and SFGV?
IVV and SFGV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and SFGV?
IVV and SFGV share 180 common holdings with a 24.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 851 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or SFGV?
IVV yields 1.10% while SFGV yields 2.34%, so SFGV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.