QQQ vs SGLC
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs SGI US Large Cap Core ETF
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. SGLC delivered stronger 1-year returns. SGLC offers more diversification with 123 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | SGLC | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.85% | |
| AUM | $496.3B | $213M | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 0.20% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 123 | |
| YTD Return | +16.23% | +17.44% | |
| 1Y Return | +26.23% | +28.38% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.75% | +22.12% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.78% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.6% | 13.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.0% | -20.2% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Summit Global Investments | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Mar 31, 2023 |
QQQ vs SGLC Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and SGI US Large Cap Core ETF (SGLC) is a ETF from Summit Global Investments. Over the past year QQQ returned +26.23% while SGLC returned +28.38%. Year to date, QQQ is up 16.23% versus a gain of 17.44% for SGLC.
Over three years, QQQ compounded at +25.75% per year against +22.12% for SGLC. Across the full 3-year window we track, SGLC has the edge at +22.27% annualized vs +13.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 13.1% for SGLC. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for QQQ and -20.2% for SGLC. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while SGLC charges 0.85%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $85 annually, a gap of $67 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 0.20% for SGLC.
Holdings Overlap
QQQ and SGLC share 46 holdings out of 216 unique holdings combined, representing a 49.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or SGLC?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while SGLC charges 0.85%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $67 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQ or SGLC?
Over the past year QQQ returned +26.23% vs +28.38% for SGLC, so SGLC leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), QQQ annualized +13.02% vs +22.27% for SGLC. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQ or SGLC?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 13.1% for SGLC. Worst drawdown: QQQ -83.0% vs SGLC -20.2%.
Should I hold both QQQ and SGLC?
QQQ and SGLC have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and SGLC?
QQQ and SGLC share 46 common holdings with a 49.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 216 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or SGLC?
QQQ yields 0.44% while SGLC yields 0.20%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.