QQQ vs TALV

QQQ vs TALV

Which is better, QQQ or TALV?

Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Value.

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. TALV led over 1Y. TALV is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.7%.

Lower Fees: QQQHigher Returns (1Y): TALVLess Concentrated: TALV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricQQQTALV
Expense Ratio0.18%Best0.49%
AUM$506.1B$178M
Dividend Yield0.42%0.73%
Holdings32170
YTD Return+5.89%+15.17%Best
1Y Return+4.30%+17.15%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+21.26%-
5Y Return (annualized)+10.84%-
Top 10 Weight46.7%33.5%Best
Fund FamilyInvesco (US)Transamerica
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Value
InceptionMar 10, 1999Dec 15, 2025

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

QQQ vs TALV growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

QQQ vs TALV Performance

Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Transamerica Large Value Active ETF (TALV) is an ETF from Transamerica. Over the past year QQQ returned +4.30% while TALV returned +17.15%. Year to date, QQQ is up 5.89% versus a gain of 15.17% for TALV.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

QQQ charges 0.18% per year while TALV charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $49 annually, a gap of $31 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.42% against 0.73% for TALV.

Holdings Overlap

QQQ already in TALV35.9%
TALV already in QQQ30.3%

35.9% of QQQ's money is in holdings TALV also owns. 30.3% of TALV's money is in holdings QQQ also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

14 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 68 in TALV, against full books of 321 and 70.

What only one of them owns

Measured across the 101 and 68 positions we hold weights for.

QQQ holds 80 positions TALV does not, 61.3% of the fund.

Largest: NVDA 8.33%, AMD 4.17%, GOOG 2.85%, TSLA 2.82%, SPCX 2.70%

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in QQQWeight in TALVDifference
AAPLApple, Inc7.35%5.22%2.13%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp5.76%5.28%0.48%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc4.07%5.51%1.44%
MUMicron Technology, Inc.5.02%0.84%4.18%
METAMeta Platforms Inc3.26%1.59%1.67%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc3.05%1.48%1.57%
CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares1.77%2.16%0.39%
AVGOBroadcom Inc2.53%1.14%1.39%
GILDGilead Sciences0.77%1.67%0.90%
AMGNAmgen Inc.0.95%1.04%0.09%

35.9% of QQQ is already inside TALV.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

QQQTALV

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, QQQ or TALV?

QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while TALV charges 0.49%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $31 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, QQQ or TALV?

Over the past year QQQ returned +4.30% vs +17.15% for TALV, so TALV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and TALV?

35.9% of QQQ's money is in holdings TALV also owns. 30.3% of TALV's is in holdings QQQ also owns. They hold 14 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 68 in TALV.

Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or TALV?

QQQ yields 0.42% while TALV yields 0.73%, so TALV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is TALV better than QQQ?

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. TALV led over 1Y. TALV is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.