QQQ vs TMVE

QQQ vs TMVE

Which is better, QQQ or TMVE?

Large Cap Growth against Mid Cap Value.

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. TMVE led over 1Y. TMVE is less concentrated, with 19.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%.

Lower Fees: QQQHigher Returns (1Y): TMVELess Concentrated: TMVE

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricQQQTMVE
Expense Ratio0.18%Best0.55%
AUM$483.5B$290M
Dividend Yield0.44%0.10%
Holdings10785
YTD Return+17.21%Best+13.43%
1Y Return+22.10%-
3Y Return (annualized)+25.27%-
5Y Return (annualized)+14.60%-
Top 10 Weight46.5%19.6%Best
Fund FamilyInvesco (US)Thrivent Funds
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthMid Cap Value
InceptionMar 10, 1999Nov 17, 2025

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

QQQ vs TMVE growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

QQQ vs TMVE Performance

Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Thrivent Mid Cap Value ETF (TMVE) is an ETF from Thrivent Funds. Year to date, QQQ is up 17.21% versus a gain of 13.43% for TMVE.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

QQQ charges 0.18% per year while TMVE charges 0.55%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $55 annually, a gap of $37 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 0.10% for TMVE.

Holdings Overlap

QQQ already in TMVE3.3%
TMVE already in QQQ7.8%

3.3% of QQQ's money is in holdings TMVE also owns. 7.8% of TMVE's money is in holdings QQQ also owns.

TMVE and QQQ share little of their money.

7 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 83 in TMVE, against full books of 107 and 85.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 67 positions for TMVE that do not appear in our book for QQQ (81.7% of the fund), and 89 for QQQ that do not appear in TMVE (94.3%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in QQQWeight in TMVEDifference
QCOMQualcomm Inc.0.73%1.23%0.50%
CEGConstellation Energy Corporation Com0.42%1.44%1.02%
CSXCsx Corp.0.42%1.19%0.77%
SNPSSynopsys0.34%1.20%0.86%
WDCWestern Digital Corp Company Guar 11/28 30.79%0.65%0.14%
FANGDiamondback Energy, Inc.0.23%1.12%0.89%
MDLZMondelez International Inc Com A Npv0.35%0.96%0.61%

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of QQQ and TMVE you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

QQQTMVE

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, QQQ or TMVE?

QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while TMVE charges 0.55%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $37 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and TMVE?

7.8% of TMVE's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 7.8% of TMVE's is in holdings QQQ also owns. They hold 7 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 83 in TMVE.

Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or TMVE?

QQQ yields 0.44% while TMVE yields 0.10%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is TMVE better than QQQ?

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. TMVE led over 1Y. TMVE is less concentrated, with 19.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.