QQQ vs VGRO

QQQ vs VGRO

Which is better, QQQ or VGRO?

QQQ costs less.

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 70.3%.

Lower Fees: QQQLess Concentrated: QQQ

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricQQQVGRO
Expense Ratio0.18%Best0.35%
AUM$483.5B$4M
Dividend Yield0.44%0.00%
Holdings10729
YTD Return+17.95%Best+1.14%
1Y Return+21.77%-
3Y Return (annualized)+25.63%-
5Y Return (annualized)+15.24%-
Top 10 Weight46.5%Best70.3%
Fund FamilyInvesco (US)Virtus Investment Partners
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Growth
InceptionMar 10, 1999Dec 22, 2025

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

QQQ vs VGRO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

QQQ vs VGRO Performance

Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Virtus Silvant Growth Opportunities ETF (VGRO) is an ETF from Virtus Investment Partners. Year to date, QQQ is up 17.95% versus a gain of 1.14% for VGRO.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

QQQ charges 0.18% per year while VGRO charges 0.35%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $35 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 0.00% for VGRO.

Holdings Overlap

QQQ already in VGRO42.6%
VGRO already in QQQ71.0%

42.6% of QQQ's money is in holdings VGRO also owns. 71.0% of VGRO's money is in holdings QQQ also owns.

Most of VGRO is already inside QQQ. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

17 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 28 in VGRO, against full books of 107 and 29.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 10 positions for VGRO that do not appear in our book for QQQ (26.2% of the fund), and 80 for QQQ that do not appear in VGRO (55.6%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in QQQWeight in VGRODifference
NVDANvidia Corp8.44%17.09%8.65%
GOOGAlphabet Inc3.13%13.31%10.18%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp5.76%6.55%0.79%
AAPLApple, Inc7.27%4.97%2.30%
AVGOBroadcom Inc3.16%6.34%3.18%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc4.67%2.82%1.85%
METAMeta Platforms Inc2.78%3.95%1.17%
NFLXNetflix, Inc.1.37%2.69%1.32%
PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc1.60%2.24%0.64%
ASL:ASAsml Holding Nv Unsponsored Adr Ordinary Shares0.68%2.42%1.74%

71.0% of VGRO is already inside QQQ.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

QQQVGRO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, QQQ or VGRO?

QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while VGRO charges 0.35%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $17 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and VGRO?

71.0% of VGRO's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 71.0% of VGRO's is in holdings QQQ also owns. They hold 17 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 28 in VGRO.

Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or VGRO?

QQQ yields 0.44% while VGRO yields 0.00%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VGRO better than QQQ?

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 70.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.