QQQ vs WANT
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X ETF
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | WANT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 1.00% | |
| AUM | $496.3B | $21M | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 0.54% | |
| Holdings | 108 | 54 | |
| YTD Return | +16.64% | -13.16% | |
| 1Y Return | +27.27% | -6.55% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.96% | +14.40% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.54% | -8.30% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.6% | 70.0% | |
| Max Drawdown | -83.0% | -85.9% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Nov 29, 2018 |
QQQ vs WANT Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X ETF (WANT) is a ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust. Over the past year QQQ returned +27.27% while WANT returned -6.55%. Year to date, QQQ is up 16.64% versus a loss of 13.16% for WANT.
Over three years, QQQ compounded at +25.96% per year against +14.40% for WANT; over five years the annualized figures are +14.54% and -8.30% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.03% annualized vs +7.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
WANT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 70.0% compared with 30.6% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for QQQ and -85.9% for WANT. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while WANT charges 1.00%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $100 annually, a gap of $82 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 0.54% for WANT.
Holdings Overlap
QQQ and WANT share 9 holdings out of 143 unique holdings combined, representing a 10.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or WANT?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while WANT charges 1.00%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $82 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QQQ or WANT?
Over the past year QQQ returned +27.27% vs -6.55% for WANT, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), QQQ annualized +13.03% vs +7.44% for WANT. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QQQ or WANT?
WANT has been the more volatile fund at 70.0% annualized versus 30.6% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: QQQ -83.0% vs WANT -85.9%.
Should I hold both QQQ and WANT?
QQQ and WANT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and WANT?
QQQ and WANT share 9 common holdings with a 10.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 143 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or WANT?
QQQ yields 0.44% while WANT yields 0.54%, so WANT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.